Super portfolio mix putting investors at risk

13 August 2014
| By Malavika |
image
image
expand image

Australian superannuation portfolios have been identified as an "aggressive constant mix", leaving investors in the pre- and post-retirement stages at risk, research revealed.

The Centre for International Finance and Regulation (CIFR) funded a study into the ‘retirement risk zone', which said 70-90 per cent of assets are allocated to growth assets.

This remained the case even during the 2008 global financial crisis, when retirees got stung in the downturn, authors of the study Professor Geoffrey Kingston and Professor Lance Fisher, both from Macquarie University, said.

"Current strategies leave retirees particularly exposed due to high allocations to growth assets," lead author Kingston said.

"If the share of growth assets is progressively scaled back to about half, the risk experienced around retirement can be managed."

The study compared trends in the United States, and said Australia is lagging when it comes to best practice.

The authors of the study are urging the industry, the Australian Securities and Investments Commission, the Australian Prudential Regulation authority and individual households to move away from constant-mix asset allocations.

Kingston recommended a different asset allocation strategy be brought in for retirement funds, where exposure to risky assets declines as investors inch closer to retirement age, and rises again after retirement.

Seven out of 10 households in Australia depend mostly on their pension for an income in retirement, while nine out of 10 draw some pension during retirement.

"By ensuring superannuation assets are less risky around the point of retirement, we can positively impact Australia's pension liabilities," Kingston said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Squeaky'21

My view is that after 2026 there will be quite a bit less than 10,000 'advisers' (investment advisers) and less than 100...

1 week ago
Jason Warlond

Dugald makes a great point that not everyone's definition of green is the same and gives a good example. Funds have bee...

1 week ago
Jasmin Jakupovic

How did they get the AFSL in the first place? Given the green light by ASIC. This is terrible example of ASIC's incompet...

1 week 1 day ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 2 weeks ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 2 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND