Super industry at odds on SG increase

Retirement-Income-Review/RIR/ASFA/challenger/Jeremy-Cooper/Cbus/superannuation-guarantee/

30 November 2020
| By Jassmyn |
image
image image
expand image

Despite the Retirement Income Review (RIR) being published, there are still polar opinions when it comes to increasing the superannuation guarantee (SG), with some industry experts saying they are “ambivalent” as to whether it rises or not.

Speaking on an Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA) panel to discuss the Government’s RIR, Challenger chair, Jeremy Cooper, said he was ambivalent and lacked a strong view whether the SG increased to 12% or not.

“We are in low interest rate, low growth, low wage rise environment – it’s a global thing. There are no personalised SG rates and this affects everyone across the system. I’m very ambivalent, I don’t have a strong view one way or another and it’s absolutely a governmental decision,” he said.

“The magic of system is that we went to 9% in 2002 and it’s quite incremental for me. Personally, 9.5% to 12% I find much more incremental and it will take a long time. If you’re over 50 it’ll barely have an impact on retirement outcomes, certainly if you’re 30 it will. There’s a lot of other things swimming around this issue.”

Cbus group executive brand, advocacy, and product, Robbie Campo, disagreed and said the SG increase was significant for those earning minimum wage.

“I’m not ambivalent. One of the benefits of system is that it is incremental. The increases are not perceptible in terms of people’s loss of take-home pay, they don’t notice that, and it’s not actually for most people a real hard impact.

“Certainly, even though what the report found was those in bottom third, who would largely be minimum wage earners, there’s not nearly any offset of super because the assessment was made across the system.

“Even if you accept that there’s no real offset because their loss of retirement is more significant over their lifetime – $28,000 – than the modelled assumed increase in working life income which is $12,000.

“Certainty the impacts for different cohorts are very  different and those seeing inadequate levels of retirement income that was found in the report are those who will benefit from increasing the SG and for whom this reported trade-off is not really even there even if you accept that it occurs.”

However, they both agreed that the superannuation system could not cure housing affordability.

“Housing affordability isn’t about money, it’s lack of supply. Taking money out of super and putting it into a system where there is insufficient supply will drive up the cost,” Campo said.

“There are other things that better address lack of availability of housing.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

5 months ago

Glad to see the back of you Steve. You made financial more expensive, not more affordable as you claim, and presided ...

5 months ago

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

7 months ago

Commonwealth Bank has formally dropped to zero advisers following LGT Crestone’s acquisition of its advice arm – some six years on from the Hayne royal commission. ...

4 weeks ago

The FSCP has issued a written direction to an adviser who charged clients “extraordinary fees” for inappropriate and conflicted advice, as well as encouraged them to swit...

1 week 4 days ago

ASIC has cancelled the AFSL of an advice firm associated with Shield and First Guardian collapses, and permanently banned its responsible manager. ...

3 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
1
DomaCom DFS Mortgage
92.15 3 y p.a(%)
3