Subscale funds negatively affect 1.7m members

financial-services-council/ASIC/

7 September 2017
| By Jassmyn |
image
image
expand image

A member of a subscale superannuation fund could be potentially $170,000 worse off than a member of a best performing fund because of the current industrial system, according to the Financial Services Council (FSC).

Using Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) and modern awards data, an analysis by the FSC found subscale funds managed $94 billion and left up to 1.7 million members potentially hundreds of thousands of dollars worse off in retirement.

 The FSC said subscale funds made up 153 (30.2 per cent) of modern award superannuation listings and 33 funds managed less than $10 billion in funds. The average performance of the 33 funds over 10 years was 4.5 per cent.

The FSC said this was 0.8 per cent lower than the average 5.3 per cent performance of all ‘growth’ options in the market for both industry and retail funds, and 1.4 per cent lower than the performance of the best performing MySuper products.

The weakest performing fund returned 2.7 per cent over 10 years, managed less than $1 billion, and was listed in two modern awards.

FSC chief executive, Sally Loane, said: “If this many Australian workers were enabled by law to languish in poorly paying jobs with working conditions way below their peers, for as long as 40 years, there’d be outrage across the entire community”.

 

“So, we shouldn’t tolerate a system which leaves people in superannuation funds delivering significantly poor returns, for years and years,” she said.

“Many can’t change funds because of the current industrial laws governing default super, and many are chronically disengaged and disinterested. Either way, the system needs to change if the policy is going to work for all Australians.”

Loane said the prevalence of subscale funds in the default system was a major public policy issue that need to be addressed given the negative impact on consumers’ financial outcomes.

The FSC’s submission to the Productivity Commission on the competitiveness and efficiency of the super system recommended a model that allowed consumers to exit underperforming, subscale funds and switch to a fund regardless of whether it was a retail or an industry fund, which would deliver stronger returns and a more comfortable retirement.

 

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

4 months 1 week ago

Glad to see the back of you Steve. You made financial more expensive, not more affordable as you claim, and presided ...

4 months 2 weeks ago

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

6 months 2 weeks ago

Commonwealth Bank has formally dropped to zero advisers following LGT Crestone’s acquisition of its advice arm – some six years on from the Hayne royal commission. ...

1 week 4 days ago

ASIC has cancelled the AFSL of an advice firm associated with Shield and First Guardian collapses, and permanently banned its responsible manager. ...

3 days 9 hours ago

ASIC has banned a former NSW adviser from providing advice for 10 years for investing at least $14.8 million into a cryptocurrency-based scam. ...

4 days 13 hours ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
1
DomaCom DFS Mortgage
92.15 3 y p.a(%)
3