SMAs’ transparency proves popular with SMSF trustees
Separately-managed accounts’ (SMA) centralised reporting function makes them a superior option to managed funds, particularly following the growth of self-managed super funds (SMSF), a wealth adviser believes.
In addition to flexibility, their tax efficient structure often results in better performance after costs, according to Crystal Wealth Partners’ executive director John McIlroy.
His reasoning is that individual investors’ tax position is not compromised by the movements of other investors, which is not the case for managed funds.
McIllroy said this is particularly beneficial for SMSF trustees, who often seek transparency and flexibility.
The obligation of SMAs to divulge portfolio assets through centralised reporting is a key part of this transparency, he said.
And unlike pooled structures, which can expose investors to unrealised gains and losses, the individual nature of SMAs shields investors from the actions of other investors, McIlroy added.
AUTHOR
Staff Writer
Recommended for you
With just 30 per cent of Australians knowing their superannuation balance to the nearest $1,000, Findex has emphasised the role of financial advice in addressing the critical super knowledge gap.
Underestimating the cost of insurance by almost $75,000 in a Statement of Advice is among multiple reasons that a relevant provider has faced action from the FSCP.
Financial Services Council chief executive, Blake Briggs, is urging Minister for Financial Services, Stephen Jones, to take advantage of the QAR opportunity to reduce regulatory duplication and ensure advice is affordable.
Former chair of the House of Representatives’ Standing Economics Committee, Tim Wilson, is planning a return to politics after losing his seat in the 2022 federal election.
