Small business claims super disadvantage

small-business/COSBOA/superannuation/funds/SG-contributions/superannuation-guarantee/

3 August 2018
| By Mike |
image
image image
expand image

The only people and groups which benefit from Australia’s superannuation system are the funds and their corporate and union stakeholders, according to the Council of Small Business Organisations of Australia (COSBOA).

In a follow-up submission to the Productivity Commission inquiry into superannuation competitiveness and efficiency the COSBOA has reinforced its argument that employers should either be removed from the superannuation guarantee (SG) collection process or be paid for the work they do in ensuring payment of SG contributions.

The submission described the obligation on employers to pay the guarantee as a “forced arrangement”.

“… this forced arrangement combined with the nature of the make-up of superannuation funds has created a collection process that creates confusion and inefficiencies for business and superannuation funds as well as for members of funds,” it said.

“It also provides opportunities for vested interests to manipulate the system to their advantage and to the disadvantage of members in their funds as well as to the employers forced to collect their contributions,” the submission said. “Indeed, the only individuals in the system who do not get paid for the work they do is the small business person who is also the only person who can get fined.”

“Furthermore, as discussed at the hearing, we believe the current threshold for payment of superannuation has been set at $450 earnings over a period of a month (in most cases) since the inception of the Superannuation Guarantee.,” it said. “This was originally determined based on the tax-free threshold; that threshold has now risen from what was around $5,000 to over $18,000.”

It said that, on this basis, the threshold had to rise to match that increase.

“We do note however that under our proposal to remove employers from the collection process that the idea of a threshold for earnings for superannuation to be paid becomes redundant,” the submission said. “We would like to reinforce that the current superannuation collection process is overly complicated and lacking in transparency for employers and employees. It seems that the only people or groups who benefit from the system are the funds and their corporate and union stakeholders.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 2 days ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

AMP has settled on two court proceedings: one class action which affected superannuation members and a second regarding insurer policies. ...

2 days 15 hours ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 5 days ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks 5 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo