Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo
 
 

Publisher's super scare campaign ends in penalty

superannuation/ASIC/advertising/

22 March 2016
| By Mike |
image
image image
expand image

A Melbourne publishing company which published material suggesting the Government intended nationalising superannuation has been pursued by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) and made to pay a $21,600 penalty for conducting a misleading scare campaign. 

The company, Port Phillip Publishing Pty Ltd, referenced a financial strategy dubbed the "Exodus Initiative" accessible by subscribing to its publication "Tactical Wealth". 

The infringement notice issued by ASIC quoted a video published by the company as stating: "If you've got any interest in in keeping the government away from your and your children's retirement savings then I ask you to do two things today. First take a 30 day trial of my newsletter and download the Exodus initiative now". 

According to a statement issued by ASIC, the statements published by the company claimed that: 

  • The Australian Government intended to nationalise and take ownership of superannuation; 
  • And that because of this, the Australian public would be unable to access their retirement savings; and 
  • That consumers ought to consider strategies to protect their superannuation from being stolen by the Government by subscribing to an online publication of Port Phillip. 

The statement said the statements had appeared in a PowerPoint video presentation and on the company's primary business website. 

The ASIC statement said Port Phillip Publishing paid a penalty of $21,600 after ASIC issued two infringement notices for false and misleading advertising. Each infringement notice imposed a penalty of $10,800. 

Port Phillip Publishing Pty Ltd removed the statements prior to being notified of ASIC's concerns. 

The ASIC statement noted that the payment of an infringement notice did not represent an admission of a contravention of the ASIC Act consumer protection provisions and that ASIC could  issue an infringement notice where it had reasonable grounds to believe a person had contravened certain consumer protection laws.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 2 days ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

AMP has settled on two court proceedings: one class action which affected superannuation members and a second regarding insurer policies. ...

2 days 4 hours ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 5 days ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks 5 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND