Parliament told: Don’t bail out bad SMSF decision-makers

SMSFs/regulation/

5 April 2017
| By Mike |
image
image image
expand image

Self-managed superannuation fund (SMSF) trustees should not be given access to an industry-funded compensation fund to bail them out of bad decisions, according to the SMSF Owner’s Alliance.

In a submission to the Senate Economics Committee review of Consumer Protection in the Banking, Finance and Insurance Sector the Alliance has urged that SMSF trustees be made to accept legal responsibility for all their investment decisions, “including those that turn out not have been made wisely”.

The submission said the alliance fully supported the Australian Securities and Investments Commission’s (ASIC’s) efforts to crack down on property promoters giving investment advice when they were not licensed because just like any consumer of financial services, SMSF trustees should be protected by law from unscrupulous and dishonest promotion of investment schemes.

“However, this does not absolve trustees from responsibility for their investment decisions, even if they are based on poor or dubious advice,” it said, pointing to the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) trustee declaration form within which SMSF trustees declare acceptance of their obligation to “exercise skill, care and diligence in managing the fund” and to “act in the best interests of all of the members of the fund”.

“So trustees must accept legal responsibility for all their investment decisions, including those that turn out not to have been made wisely,” the submission said.

“It may be suggested to the committee that a fund be established to compensate people who have been encouraged to set up a self-managed fund to make a leveraged investment and who have suffered financial loss as a result,” it said. “We would disagree with any such proposal. It would clearly be a moral hazard as people could make an unwise investment decision knowing they would be compensated if it went bad.”

“If such a compensation scheme were to be funded by a levy on all self-managed funds it would amount to penalising the great majority of trustees who manage their funds well to bail out the small minority who make unwise investment decisions.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

2 months 1 week ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

3 months ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

3 months 1 week ago

BlackRock Australia plans to launch a Bitcoin ETF later this month, wrapping the firm’s US-listed version which is US$85 billion in size....

1 week 6 days ago

ASIC has banned a Melbourne-based financial adviser for eight years over false and misleading statements regarding clients’ superannuation investments....

3 weeks 5 days ago

ASIC has banned a Melbourne-based financial adviser who gave inappropriate advice to his clients including false and misleading Statements of Advice....

3 weeks 4 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
moneymanagement logo