Industry funds’ expenditure on govt radar

The Federal Government has indicated it will be cracking down on industry funds by compelling them to provide transparency in the way members’ funds are being expended.

In an interview with the ABC, the Minister for Revenue and Financial Services, Kelly O’Dwyer, said the government would introduce changes that were broad ranging to provide more accountability and transparency on how members’ money were being used.

However, she emphasised the changes would apply across the board to corporate funds, retail funds and industry funds.

Related News:

“We are going to be giving the regulator strengthened powers to be able to ensure that members’ money is spent in their best interest because let’s not forget, if funds are not spending money in members’ best interest, that has a compounding impact over time and it ultimately means a lower retirement income when people need to draw down on those funds…” O’Dwyer said.

She said the regulator did not have sufficient information on how money was being expended, for example, in relation to sponsorship activities, and there was no detailed breakdown on how the money was being used. She cited reports which stated “certain funds that were kicking back for instance, over $1 million to the union movement, and some of that’s to do with sponsorship money”.

“Let’s not forget that during the Trade Union Royal Commission that was recently held, we heard evidence that there were superannuation liaison officers who were being paid $96,000 for two days’ worth of work,” O’Dwyer said.

“That money was going directly back to the union movement and when put on the stand and questioned about this, a particular officer who was being paid this amount of money couldn’t justify that this was in members’ best interest.”

Recommended for you



Kelly O'Dwyer should be careful what she wishes for. This new 'transparency' is a none-too-subtle sledge directed at Industry Funds however the proposed transparency provisions apply equally to corporate and retail funds. In the interests of full disclosure, ALL funds would be required to show full "Schedule 10-style" (i.e. prescribed) information about promotional, and other cross-subsidisation, expenses - couched in terms of their meeting the Sole Purpose Test. Me, I look forward to it!

I actually thought for once O'Dwyer was about to put the compliance blow torch to ISA when she started the quote to 'ensure that members’ money is spent in their best interest because let’s not forget, if funds are not spending money in members’ best interest...' and then completely waffles about an 'impact'. Lady, that is the one trustee OBLIGATION! It is the thing that ASIC have begun to crucify individual planners over, for vastly lower amounts of money. Great real in how you approach your role as a minister, or get out of the way of someone better.

Add new comment