Is the Govt building to far-reaching superannuation changes?

federal government superannuation Retirement Income Covenant Retirement Income Review Jane Hume

25 May 2020
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

The Federal Government has added to superannuation industry concerns that it is looking to far-reaching changes in the post-COVID-19 environment, with the announcement that its deferring plans to introduce the Retirement Income Covenant from 1 July. 

The announcement comes on top of the Government’s deferral of its Retirement Income Review and comes at the same time as a number of back-benchers continue to advocate for a far-reaching review of the superannuation regime including compulsion and as the Government’s hardship early release regime continues to play out. 

Announcing the deferral of the Retirement Income Covenant, the Assistant Minister for Superannuation, Financial Services and Financial Technology, Senator Jane Hume, said it was necessary to allow continued consultation and legislative drafting to take place place following the Coronavirus crisis. 

She noted that superannuation laws currently require trustees to formulate, review and give effect to investment, risk management and insurance strategies. The purpose of the Retirement Income Covenant is to establish an additional obligation for trustees to formulate a retirement income strategy for their members. 

Hume said deferral of the Retirement Income Covenant would allow drafting of the measure to be informed by the Retirement Income Review. 

“We’ve been working for some time on a Retirement Income Covenant. While efficient accumulation is imperative and we are steadily chipping away at the inefficiencies of that part of the system, we need to build a smoother transition from the accumulation to the de-accumulation phase,” she said. 

“Of course, there is nothing stopping funds and their trustees from developing retirement income strategies now and we’d encourage them to do so.  Trustees don’t need to wait for us to legislate the Covenant.” 

A number of Government back-benchers have been questioning the rationale underpinning the existing superannuation system and have raised the issue of compulsion for younger, low balance members. 

At the same time, some superannuation executives have expressed concern that the current hardship early release regime may represent the thin end of a wedge for the Government’s long-term policy approach to superannuation. 

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

GG

So shareholders lose a dividend plus have seen the erosion of value. Qantas decides to clawback remuneration from Alan ...

4 weeks ago
Denise Baker

This is why I left my last position. There was no interest in giving the client quality time, it was all about bumping ...

4 weeks 1 day ago
gonski

So the Hayne Royal Commission has left us with this. What a sad day for the financial planning industry. Clearly most ...

4 weeks 1 day ago

The decision whether to proceed with a $100 million settlement for members of the buyer of last resort class action against AMP has been decided in the Federal Court....

2 weeks ago

A former Brisbane financial adviser has been found guilty of 28 counts of fraud where his clients lost $5.9 million....

4 weeks ago

The Financial Advice Association Australia has addressed “pretty disturbing” instances where its financial adviser members have allegedly experienced “bullying” by produc...

3 weeks 1 day ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS