Cbus directors fees exceeded $1 million

compliance/industry-funds/funds-management/australian-prudential-regulation-authority/super-funds/industry-super-funds/director/

9 December 2014
| By Mike |
image
image image
expand image

A parliamentary committee has been told that director's fees for industry fund Cbus amounted to over $1million in 2012-13 and the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) was asked whether this represented industry best practice.

The chair of the House of Representatives Economics Committee, Kelly O'Dwyer pointed out to APRA senior executive that there seemed to be "a significant difference in the fees paid to directors between industry and retail funds".

"Cbus Super paid over $1 million in directors' fees in the 2012-13 financial year whilst AMP directors do not receive any remuneration in their capacity as directors of the company. Instead, they are paid by AMP Limited in accordance with their employment contract," she said.

O'Dwyer then asked APRA member, Helen Rowell whether she believed it was best practice for industry super funds to pay large directors' fees that are ultimately passed on to members.

"Does this, in itself, constitute a cause for concern?" she asked.

Rowell responded that she believed it was reasonable to expect that directors be paid for serving on a board and that the structures could be very different.

"In the industry fund, the not-for-profit sector, the money has to come directly out of the funds of the members. In the retail sector it can be paid directly out of the fund or it can be paid by the ultimate owner. Indirectly, those costs would be recouped through the fees and expenses charged at the super funds," Rowell said. "So, on balance, I am not sure you could draw a conclusion that the members in one fund or another are being disadvantaged; it is just about the different nature of the arrangement and the flows and where the directors' costs are being met from."

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 month 3 weeks ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

2 months 2 weeks ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

2 months 3 weeks ago

ASIC has canceled the AFSL of Sydney-based asset consultant and research firm....

3 weeks 4 days ago

ASIC has banned a Melbourne-based financial adviser for eight years over false and misleading statements regarding clients’ superannuation investments....

1 week 6 days ago

ASIC has banned a Melbourne-based financial adviser who gave inappropriate advice to his clients including false and misleading Statements of Advice....

1 week 4 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
moneymanagement logo