Are SMSF start-ups being constrained?

SMSFs/ASFA/

20 September 2016
| By Mike |
image
image image
expand image

Tighter regulatory settings and associated enforcement around the provision of advice by accountants and other promoters around the establishment of self-managed superannuation funds (SMSFs) may have acted to constrain the marketing of the sector in recent years, according to the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA).

In its submission responding to the Productivity Commission's draft report on assessing superannuation competitiveness and efficiency, ASFA has directly questioned the commission's emphasis on the size of the SMSF sector and switching rates to and from funds regulated by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA).

"While the presence of SMSFs helps to demonstrate that the superannuation system is competitive, looking at SMSFs and switching in isolation does not provide a comprehensive picture of competition," it said.

The submission argued that SMSFs catered to only a relatively small proportion of overall fund members, especially given that their substantial fixed operating costs, and the legal and operational obligations imposed on SMSF trustees, meant that "they are really only viable with respect to relatively large account balances where the members are prepared to assume responsibility for operating the SMSF".

It said surveys had consistently shown that a key reason for establishing an SMSF related to having greater control over investment decisions, including the timing of acquisitions and disposals and that tax and estate planning also could be important reasons for establishing an SMSF, as could be a desire to place a property or building, used in business activities by one or more fund members, within superannuation.

"For the great bulk of fund members these factors are not significant issues," it said.

The ASFA submission argued that the size of the SMSF sector was also influenced by factors not related to competition, such as the size of concessional and non-concessional contribution caps, with lower caps tending to impact more on SMSF members given that SMSF members tended to be wealthier on average.

"Tighter regulatory settings and associated enforcement regarding the provision of advice by accountants and other promoters in regard to the establishment of SMSFs also may have constrained the marketing of SMSFs in recent years," it said.

"It is also worth acknowledging that the SMSF sector's share of system assets and members has declined slightly over the last few years."

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

4 months 3 weeks ago

Glad to see the back of you Steve. You made financial more expensive, not more affordable as you claim, and presided ...

5 months ago

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

7 months ago

Commonwealth Bank has formally dropped to zero advisers following LGT Crestone’s acquisition of its advice arm – some six years on from the Hayne royal commission. ...

3 weeks 5 days ago

The FSCP has issued a written direction to an adviser who charged clients “extraordinary fees” for inappropriate and conflicted advice, as well as encouraged them to swit...

1 week 1 day ago

ASIC has cancelled the AFSL of an advice firm associated with Shield and First Guardian collapses, and permanently banned its responsible manager. ...

2 weeks 4 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
1
DomaCom DFS Mortgage
92.15 3 y p.a(%)
3