Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo
 
 

Consumer protection answer to LRBA risk

smsf-association/lrbas/limited-recourse-borrowing-arrangements/John-Maroney/ASIC/australian-securities-and-investments-commission/productivity-commission/

1 February 2019
| By Hannah Wootton |
image
image image
expand image

The SMSF Association has reiterated its opposition to any outright ban on limited recourse borrowing arrangements (LRBAs), saying that they benefit small business owners and calling instead for an increase in consumer protection for the debt instrument.

In a submission to Treasury for the Council of Financial Regulators’ review of LRBAs, the Association said that rather than creating “systemic risk” for the superannuation sector, LRBAs allowed small business owners to transfer business real property which was crucial to their retirement plans.

SMSF Association chief executive, John Maroney, said that banning the use of personal guarantees supporting LRBAs would help mitigate the risks associated with them and also limit the ability of property spruikers to use the instruments as a vehicle for promoting speculative property investments.

“Personal guarantees given by SMSF trustees do allow the SMSF to undertake larger borrowings with higher LVR ratios. So … prohibiting SMSF members from providing a personal guarantee for their borrowings would make it more difficult for lenders to make risky, high LVR borrowings to SMSFs,” he said.

“Lenders would also need to be certain that the SMSF is able to adequately service the loan based on the financial circumstances of the SMSF members within the superannuation system instead of looking at circumstances and assets outside superannuation.”

Maroney believed that this measure would also reduce LRBAs encouraging individuals to establish SMSFs with a small balance just to buy property.

Another consumer protection that could help manage the risks of LRBAs could be the introduction of a mandatory specialist qualification for giving advice on SMSFs, a call echoing similar ones by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) and Productivity Commission.

“Tightening licensing requirements around LRBA advice and increased scrutiny of this type of advice could assist in ensuring the integrity of LRBAs,” Maroney said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

6 days 7 hours ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 2 days ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks 2 days ago

While the profession continues to see consolidation at the top, Adviser Ratings has compared the business models of Insignia and Entireti and how they are shaping the pro...

2 weeks 3 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND