Westpac leads fees-for-no-service compensation
Westpac has paid or offered to pay out the most compensation for fees-for-no-service misconduct since 2016, according to figures from the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC).
Six of Australia’s largest banking and financial services institutions have paid or offered $1.86 billion in compensation to customers who suffered loss due to misconduct or non-compliant advice.
Compensation payments made or offered by the institution as at 30 June 2021
|
Institution |
Fees for no service misconduct |
Non-compliant advice |
||
|
|
Compensation paid or offered |
No. of customers |
Compensation paid |
No. of customers |
|
Westpac |
$578,441,530 |
71,498 |
$51,684,367 |
3001 |
|
NAB |
$556,144,345 |
677,531 |
80,002,139 |
2183 |
|
AMP |
$230,418,976 |
225,513 |
$38,892,310 |
2961 |
|
CBA |
$169,311,920 |
57,930 |
$9,354,027 |
626 |
|
ANZ |
$96,969,608 |
32,916 |
$44,700,475 |
2123 |
|
Macquarie |
$4,628,000 |
1,105 |
- |
- |
|
Total |
$1,635,914,379 |
1,066,493 |
$224,633,318 |
10,894 |
Source: ASIC
AMP, ANZ, CBA, Macquarie, NAB and Westpac undertook the review and remediation programs to compensate affected customers because of two major ASIC reviews.
ASIC commenced the reviews to investigate:
- The extent of failure by the institutions to deliver ongoing advice services to financial advice customers who were paying fees to receive those services; and
- How effectively the institutions supervised their financial advisers to identify and deal with ‘non-compliant advice’.
AUTHOR
Chris Dastoor
Recommended for you
The Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) has lowered rates to a level not seen since mid-2023.
Financial Services Minister Stephen Jones has shared further details on the second tranche of the Delivering Better Financial Outcomes reforms including modernising best interests duty and reforming Statements of Advice.
The Federal Court has found a company director guilty of operating unregistered managed investment schemes and carrying on a financial services business without holding an AFSL.
The Governance Institute has said ASIC’s governance arrangements are no longer “fit for purpose” in a time when financial markets are quickly innovating and cyber crime becomes a threat.
