Treasury confirms you will pay more for one-stop EDR
The Federal Treasury has confirmed industry stakeholders including financial planners will be faced with the costs of duplication created by the Government’s push to move to the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA).
A Treasury answer to a question on notice asked during the Senate Economics Legislation Committee inquiry into the legislation underpinning the AFCA confirmed there were unavoidable extra costs associated with the exercise.
The answer also seemed to confirm that the Government-appointed Ramsay Review panel which recommended the one-stop-shop external dispute resolution (EDR) body had been aware of the likelihood of duplicative costs but had failed to quantify them.
The Treasury answer comes against the background of industry concerns that the transition process will see the industry paying for as many as four separate EDR schemes, and the likelihood that the Superannuation Complaints Tribunal (SCT) will still be working to clear its backlog of cases in 2022.
In the answer to the question on notice, the Treasury said the Ramsay Review did not quantify the dollar figure associated with duplication due to the existence of multiple external dispute resolution schemes.
It said, however, that the review had found there were duplicative costs:
- For the regulator, the Australian Securities and Investments Commission;
- For member firms; and
- For industry and consumer stakeholders (for example, due to duplication of participation in reviews of schemes’ terms of references and guidelines).
Recommended for you
The Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) has lowered rates to a level not seen since mid-2023.
Financial Services Minister Stephen Jones has shared further details on the second tranche of the Delivering Better Financial Outcomes reforms including modernising best interests duty and reforming Statements of Advice.
The Federal Court has found a company director guilty of operating unregistered managed investment schemes and carrying on a financial services business without holding an AFSL.
The Governance Institute has said ASIC’s governance arrangements are no longer “fit for purpose” in a time when financial markets are quickly innovating and cyber crime becomes a threat.
