Should super be included in product intervention regime?

The Federal Government has opened the way for discussion about whether superannuation, including MySuper, should be opened up to the same Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) product intervention power as that applied to insurance and investment products made available to retail clients.

The Treasury discussion paper underpinning the Government move on product intervention, has sought to canvass the views of industry participants on whether superannuation and retirement products should be wrapped up in the proposed new regime.

It asks those involved in the industry their views on the issue and whether they "agree with all financial products except for ordinary shares being subject to both the design and distribution obligations and the product intervention power".

Related News:

It then asks: "Are there any financial products where the existing level of consumer protections means they should be excluded from the measures (for example, default (MySuper) or mass-customised (comprehensive income products for retirement) superannuation products)?"

"Do you agree with the design and distribution obligations and the product intervention power only applying to products made available to retail clients? If not, please explain why with relevant examples," the discussion paper said.

Providing the discussion paper to the industry, the Minister for Revenue and Financial Services, Kelly O'Dwyer said the measures would improve outcomes for consumers and make ASIC a more proactive regulator.

"The design and distribution measures will make product issuers and distributors more accountable for the products they sell and are consistent with similar action already undertaken in other jurisdictions," she said.

"The product intervention power will empower ASIC to take direct action to address problems with financial products."

The consultation period around the discussion paper will last for three months, with O'Dwyer saying the Government was looking to ensure the final policy struck the right balance between increasing consumer protections without imposing an undue burden on industry or stifling innovation.

The proposed terms of the product intervention regime would see ASIC able to intervene in circumstances where it could identify significant consumer detriment with an intervention capable of lasting up to 18 months, subject to Parliamentary intervention.

The measures would impose significant new obligations on product distributors, including identifying appropriate target markets and putting in place measures to ensure the products are distributed appropriately.

Related Content

Adviser permanently banned by ASIC

A South Australian financial adviser who the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) alleged had directed client fees to his own perso...more

ASIC issues first crowd-funding licenses

The Coalition Government has welcomed the decision by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) to issue the first batch of licences...more

ASIC permanently bans South Australian adviser

A South Australian financial adviser has been permanently banned from providing financial services by the Australian Securities and Investments Commis...more




Sounds like ASIC want to load up product providers with obligations for distribution practices over which they have no control, and should be the responsibility of ASIC. More responsibility shifting that I can't see how will improve customer protection.

The regime should be risk based.In other words if products do not rate significant risk they should not be included. To assist in this regard there should be a numbering or colour code system for products representing the assessed risk of those products. Products such as Margin Lending and debt finance should br high risk. If a dealer group is selling a lot of high risk products there culture and control systems should be audited.

Add new comment