Industry funds refuse to fund planner complaints
Industry superannuation funds should not be required to cross-subsidise financial planners and others who appear before the newly-constituted Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA), according to the Australian Institute of Superannuation Trustees (AIST).
On the same day that the chair of the AFCA, former Liberal minister, Helen Coonan confirmed that AFCA would be funded by an APRA-style levy, the AIST warned against cross-subsidies by stakeholders, including superannuation funds.
AIST chief executive, Eva Scheerlinck, said there was a moral and legal obligation on super funds to ensure that members’ savings were not used to fund the resolution of complaints in other areas of the finance sector.
“It would be unacceptable, inequitable and unfair if members’ retirement savings were used to fund the resolution of disputes unrelated to superannuation, such as complaints against banks and financial advisers,” Scheerlinck said.
AIST’s submission to AFCA also raised concerns about a lack of transparency in AFCA’s proposed funding models for three different stages covering transition, interim and long-term funding.
“We request that AFCA release detailed cost projections for each dispute resolution stream to enable super funds to better understand how members’ savings are going to be used and how much will be collected from each industry sector providing the funding,” Scheerlinck said.
Recommended for you
Government has introduced a bill to Parliament to legislate the first stream of the QAR reforms.
ASIC now has a 1:1 ratio when it comes to court success in the enforcement of crypto activities and more action is expected as Treasury seeks to introduce a regulatory framework.
A leading governance body has hit out at “specialist interest groups proposing ad hoc law reform” when it comes to reforms of financial services legislation and believes an independent body is needed.
The release of ALRC’s final report into financial services legislation has highlighted financial advice as a “significant” focus as it seeks to reduce costs and help advisers understand their obligations, alongside the Quality of Advice Review.
