Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo
 
 

CommSec pays $700k infringement penalty

commsec/infringement/refund/finance/penalties/MDP/

5 September 2016
| By Oksana Patron |
image
image image
expand image

The Market Disciplinary Panel (MDP) has given two infringement notices to Commonwealth Securities Limited (CommSec) which resulted in a total penalty of $700,000 and a voluntarily refund of $1.1 million in brokerage to over 25,000 clients.

The MDP believed that CommSec had contravened the rules that related to confirmations of transactions requiring disclosure in relation to crossing and trading as principal.

According to the MDP, failures to disclose crossings took place between August 2010 and February 2014, and included 114,841 confirmations, issued by CommSec, to retail clients whose orders were executed as crossings. However they did not contain the required statement that the transactions had involved a crossing.

As a result, the MDP fined CommSec with a penalty of $300,000 for the alleged contraventions, as it did not have adequate organisational and technical procedures in place that would verify the details of an issuer sponsored holding and whether they matched that of the client who had provided the instructions prior to submitting the orders for the sale of the holdings.

As far as the failures related to disclosure of trading as principal were concerned, they referred to the period between May 2011 and February 2014.

At that time, CommSec issued 50,848 confirmations to retail clients in relation to which it had entered into transactions as principal but which did not contain the required statement that CommSec entered into the transactions as principal and not as agent.

The MDP ordered a penalty of another $400,000 for these alleged contraventions and CommSec decided to voluntarily refund around $1.1 million in brokerage to more than 25,000 clients and notify another 48,205 clients of the lack of disclosure and said that it would provide corrective disclosure.

According to the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), CommSec also co-operated throughout its investigation and did not dispute any material facts.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 3 days ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks 3 days ago

While the profession continues to see consolidation at the top, Adviser Ratings has compared the business models of Insignia and Entireti and how they are shaping the pro...

2 weeks 5 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND