ASIC prosecutes on best interests duty

best-interest-duty/best-interests/ASIC/FOFA/FOFA-compliance/

8 June 2016
| By Mike |
image
image image
expand image

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has targeted a risk-focused advice group for its first-ever action relating to alleged breaches of the Future of Financial Advice (FOFA) best interest duties requirements.

The regulator announced the move today saying the action had been initiated against Melbourne-based NSG Services Pty Ltd (formerly National Sterling Group Pty Ltd) (NSG).

It said this was the first civil penalty action ASIC had taken against a licensee alleging breaches of the best interests duty and that it was seeking declarations of breaches and financial penalties.

The ASIC announcement said that since 3 April 2008, NSG had been licensed to provide personal advice on risk insurance and superannuation products to retail clients.

The announcement said that ASIC was alleging that NSG failed to take reasonable steps to ensure that its advisers complied with the best interests obligation when providing advice to clients; and that, as a result, on numerous occasions, NSG advisers did not act in the best interests of their clients.

It said that, additionally, it was being alleged that:

  • NSG had not provided appropriate training to its advisers to ensure clients receive advice in their best interests. Instead, ASIC contends that NSG had trained its advisers that it is almost always in a client's best interest to take out some form of life risk insurance, regardless of a client's financial situation;
  • NSG's written policies relating to legal and regulatory compliance and risk management had been inadequate, and in any event, not followed or enforced;
  • since 1 July 2013, on eight specific occasions, and because of advice provided by NSG advisers, clients were sold insurance and/or advised to rollover superannuation accounts that committed them to costly, unsuitable, and unnecessary financial arrangements; and
  • regular and or substantive performance reviews of advisers had not been conducted, and disciplinary action against advisers who did not act in compliance with their obligations under the Corporations Act had not been taken.

The first hearing of the matter is listed before the Federal Court of Australia on 8 July 2016.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 3 days ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

AMP has settled on two court proceedings: one class action which affected superannuation members and a second regarding insurer policies. ...

3 days 17 hours ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 6 days ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks 6 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo