Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo
 
 

ASIC funding model needs transparency

AIST/ASIC/industry-funding/costs/

15 October 2015
| By Malavika |
image
image image
expand image

The Australian Institute of Superannuation Trustees (AIST) has treaded with caution on the proposed industry funding model for the corporate regulator, calling for a cost recovery impact statement (CIPR) for regulated entities to assess how the funding would be used.

In a submission to the Treasury, the AIST said it was concerned about the transparency and accountability of the model in the ‘Proposed Industry Funding Model for the Australian Securities and Investments Commission Consultation Paper', adding the current review process lacked a holistic approach.

The submission said no revisions to the funding model should occur until a CIPR that was in line with the Cost Recovery Guideline requirements was drafted, and implementation and public reporting of the new Regulator Performance Framework had commenced.

"This will provide transparency regarding program areas and the evaluation of performance, giving a better basis to assess resourcing needs," the submission said.

The AIST also said levy mechanisms proposed for financial advice providers did not differentiate between providers who operated via private banking operations who dealt with hundreds of thousands of dollars at a time, and those who were dealing with tens of thousands of dollars if the firms had the same number of advisers.

"For these reasons, we believe that a risk-weighting overlay such as that present in a graduated approach to levy calculation should be considered to ensure that operations pay an amount that appropriately reflects the risk to stakeholders as individuals as well as the financial system in its entirety," it said.

The submission also lamented the fact that the proposal was running simultaneously with the review by Treasury into the corporate regulator's capability, and not long after the Regulator Performance Framework.

"The undertaking of these reviews separately represents a missed opportunity, where optimal results would have been obtained from running all these at the same time," the submission said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

5 days 18 hours ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

4 weeks 2 days ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 1 day ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks 1 day ago

While the profession continues to see consolidation at the top, Adviser Ratings has compared the business models of Insignia and Entireti and how they are shaping the pro...

2 weeks 3 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND