RC points to flaws in insurance rules

Royal-Commission/Banking-Royal-Commission/life-insurance/ASIC/

11 September 2018
| By Mike |
image
image image
expand image

The Royal Commission into Misconduct in the Banking, Superannuation and Financial Services Industry has signalled its concern at the legislative arrangements around life insurance, particularly the fact that handling and settling of insurance claims is not a financial service.

In doing so, the Royal Commission has signalled the possibility of greater powers for the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) around claims handling and its ability to punish insurers who fail to live up to their duty to act in utmost good faith.

Outlining the direction of the Royal Commission’s current round of hearings into the life insurance industry, counsel assisting, Rowena Orr QC, pointed out that although most life and general insurance policies were financial products and the selling of those policies was a financial service, it was important to note that the handling and settling of insurance claims was specifically excluded from the definition of a financial service.

Orr said this meant that the obligation for an insurance company to do all things necessary to ensure that it provided financial services efficiently, honestly and fairly, did not apply to the process leading to making a decision about a claim, including the investigation of the claim and the interpretation of policy provisions, to negotiations of settlement of 20 amounts, to estimates of loss or damage, value or repair costs, or recommendations on mitigation of loss.

“This limits ASIC’s ability to take action against insurance companies where, for example, there are unnecessary or extensive delays in handling claims,” she said.

“Insurance companies are subject to the provisions of the Corporations Act and the ASIC Act concerning misleading and deceptive conduct, and unconscionable conduct. However, insurance contracts that are governed by the Insurance Contracts Act are not currently subject to the unfair contract terms provisions of the ASIC Act.”

“And the Insurance Contracts Act limits the ability of policyholders to rely on the other consumer protection provisions in the ASIC Act. Because most insurance policies are financial products, chapter 7 of the Corporations Act also imposes extensive precontractual disclosure requirements in relation to those products.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 4 days ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

AMP has settled on two court proceedings: one class action which affected superannuation members and a second regarding insurer policies. ...

4 days ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

2 weeks ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

3 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo