As ASIC begins its LIF review an adviser report tells its own story

At the same time as the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) moves further into its review of the Life Insurance Framework (LIF) key identities in the life advice sector have backed a report defending risk commissions and pointing out the current state of the life insurance market.

The report has been written by life insurance specialist, Brett Wright and argues for the retention of life/risk commissions on the basis that the experience of fee-for-service (FFS) is that advisers will need to charge consumers between $600 and $1,500 each year to do reviews and make any adjustments.

“Consumers will also need to cover any increase in premiums from the insurer too (not uncommon in today’s market for a stepped premium to increase 10% to 25%,” Wright claims.

Related News:

The report has been supported by Neos Life chief executive, John de Zwart, PPS mutual chief executive, Michael Pillemer, Bombora Advice managing director, Wayne Handley, Lonsdale, Millenium3 and IOOF Alliances chief executive, Helen Blackford, Synchron director, Don Trapnell, Austbroker adviser and director, Ben Donald and life insurance advice advocate, Nettie Handley.

Within the report Wright claims that since commissions have reduced under the LIF reforms, “premiums have been increasing, not decreasing”.

“FFS in insurance increase costs for everyone and wipe out affordable access to pooled risk and advice for those who need it most,” his report states.

“FFS makes insurance advice unaffordable for 90% to 95% of consumers and forces them to rely on inferior direct or group insurance products that generally cover less, cost more and deliver poorer claims outcomes; or even worse, consumers will not bother with insurance at all.”

“There is room for FFS and consumers who want and/or can afford FFS can access this option already. But FFS should not be the only option and it is essential consumers maintain their right to choose between the commission and FFS models and decide which is best for them.”

The report can be accessed here.




Recommended for you

Comments

Comments

So glad we don't write or offer insurance anymore. ASIC & co have essentially f*cked the system up completely, not only making it unaffordable to provide advice in this area, but also for clients to get cover or even expect someone to be there to assist them through all stages from application through to claims.

With the new claims licencing restrictions (applying only to advisers who generally don't charge clients for this service, but not to lawyers who will charge up to 45% of proceeds - go figure, sounds dodgy right, but then again this is Shipton's mob so pretty sure there must be some vested interests especially as most ASIC employees are ex-lawyers who would have mates still in law firms) there's even more red tape thrown at us - undoubtedly coerced by the risk companies whispering in ASICs ear because they hate having to pay out claims and of course the advised clients are the ones with the highest successful claim ratios.

ASIC is corrupt and broken. Fix it or put it down like the mongrel cur it is.

It sounds good but the people pushing the report are not big players, most are from licensees and they are not saying anything ground breaking. Essentially the regulators will go too far, crush the market for advice and the insurance companies and then change direction/the board when they realise it’s unsustainable and then go ‘ Oops, what do we do to fix this?’. You just need to look at the massively reduced inflows lately, already rampant underinsurance Australia wide that is going to increase, the English experience and the simple fact that not many advisers want to go near it which will all in turn push up premiums and reduce advice for those consumers that remain insured.

Add new comment