Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo
 
 

Which Aussie asset managers fell short in ESG rankings?

ESG/sustainable-investing/morningstar/greenwashing/

11 September 2023
| By Jasmine Siljic |
image
image image
expand image

Some 11 Australian asset managers have been highlighted by Morningstar as receiving a low ranking for their ESG commitments, while one has received the highest score.

The Morningstar ESG Commitment Level Landscape report qualitatively evaluated 108 asset managers across the globe.

The report aims to help ESG-minded investors assess a fund manager’s alignment to their own preferences by examining the firms’ sustainable investing philosophies and stewardship. 

Some 31 names were ranked in the low category, which included 11 Australian firms such as Allan Gray, Colonial First State, Bennelong and GQG Partners. 

Low-ranked firms are slower in adopting ESG processes, only doing so once it has become common practice or regulatory requirements, or avoid ESG considerations to align with client preferences. In addition, sustainability-focused funds make up a small percentage of their overall assets. 

The basic category saw the highest number of asset managers at 48. In particular, seven Australian managers scored as basic. 

This included AMP Capital, Ausbil Investment Management, Bell Asset Management, Betashares, Dexus, DNR Capital and First Sentier Investors. 

The next category was advanced, wherein 21 managers scored. Out of the Australian firms, Alphinity Investment Management, Altius and Melior earned this ranking. 

Eight managers earned the highest level of leader, including Australian Ethical in the local market. The other seven were Affirmative Investment Management (UK), Boston Trust Walden (US), Domini (US), Impax (UK), Parnassus (US), Robeco (NL) and Stewart Investors (UK).

Australian Ethical was recognised for its “robust integration of ESG research into all sustainability-focused solutions, spanning all asset classes”.

The firm’s investments passed comprehensive ethical, sustainability and ESG screening, Morningstar said. Additionally, they avoided any investments that violate human rights or exacerbate climate change.

“This distribution reflects the variety of the marketplace, which includes large, diversified asset managers as well as sustainability-focused firms,” the report stated.

Hortense Bioy, Morningstar global director of sustainability, observed that only five firms changed ratings out of the 50 firms reviewed this year, demonstrating the asset managers’ commitment to sustainability remaining quite stable.

“The ESG backlash in the US and accusations of greenwashing have led some asset managers to backtrack on their ESG commitments. 

“These tend to be managers with low or basic ratings, so their shifting positions haven’t come much as a surprise. Managers with advanced or leader ratings have demonstrated consistent commitment to sustainability,” she commented.

Sustainable investing professionals have observed the growing trend of ‘greenhushing’, where fund managers remove or drastically reduce available information on their responsible investing credentials to minimise greenwashing risks. 

According to Dugald Higgins, head of responsible investment and sustainability at Zenith, this approach will not help funds in the long term.

Notably, the three largest index fund managers, BlackRock, Vanguard and State Street, earned either basic or low rankings. 

The report attributed this to their constrained ability to lead on sustainability matters due to most of their assets tracking non-ESG indexes.

Morningstar reminded sustainability-focused investors to be discerning when selecting managers due to an increased number of fund choices. 

“Buying an ESG-focused or sustainable fund without doing proper due diligence on the provider could lead to disappointing results,” the report added. 

The research firm used three factors to assess each asset manager: philosophy and process, resources and active ownership.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Submitted by Hedware on Mon, 2023-09-11 18:23

Why bother with these ESG funds when their ESG investments are questionable.

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

3 days 6 hours ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 week 3 days ago

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

6 months 2 weeks ago

After last month’s surprise hold, the Reserve Bank of Australia has announced its latest interest rate decision....

5 days 2 hours ago

Libby Roy has been appointed as an independent non-executive director on the board of AZ NGA....

3 weeks 5 days ago

A professional year supervisor has been banned for five years after advice provided by his provisional relevant provider was deemed to be inappropriate, the first time th...

2 weeks 4 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
1
DomaCom DFS Mortgage
74.26 3 y p.a(%)
3