The problematic matter of regulating crypto

cryptocurrency/regulation/ALRC/

17 October 2022
| By Laura Dew |
image
image image
expand image

It is important to ensure that technology does not drive the regulation of crypto assets, according to the Australian Law Reform Commission (ALRC).

There had been a 63% increase in the number of Australians transacting digital assets between 2020 and 2021, according to ALRC, reflecting a need for their regulation.

To start with, there was no definition of ‘crypto asset’ or ‘digital asset’ in Australian legislation which made it difficult to determine how they should be regulated.

Speaking to the House of Representatives Standing Committee on Economics earlier this month, Joe Longo, chair of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) said cryptocurrency was a topic of concern for the regulator and one where it would take action on actions harming consumers.

“Promotion of these assets through popular and viral channels can make them appealing to investors, but there continues to be lack of public awareness of their highly volatile, risky and complex nature. We are supportive of government’s action to establish a regulatory framework in this space and will continue to work with Treasury and other stakeholders,” Longo said.

In a report by the Australian Law Reform Commission (ALRC) on new business models, technologies and practices, it outlined the challenges to determine how new assets such as crypto should be regulated.

“It is important to ensure that regulation is not unduly driven by technology, whether in terms of how concepts should be labelled or defined, or in terms of whether new regulation should be created to govern technology-enabled innovation.

“In this regard, it is suggested that the regulation of crypto assets should be driven less by technology and more by the function that crypto assets perform and the obligations to which persons who deal in, or provide services in relation to, crypto assets should be subject.

“A regulatory approach that is unduly driven by technology is likely to increase the complexity of the legislative framework for corporations and financial services regulation and make it more difficult to achieve meaningful compliance with the substance and intent of the law.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

5 months ago

Glad to see the back of you Steve. You made financial more expensive, not more affordable as you claim, and presided ...

5 months ago

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

7 months ago

Commonwealth Bank has formally dropped to zero advisers following LGT Crestone’s acquisition of its advice arm – some six years on from the Hayne royal commission. ...

3 weeks 6 days ago

The FSCP has issued a written direction to an adviser who charged clients “extraordinary fees” for inappropriate and conflicted advice, as well as encouraged them to swit...

1 week 3 days ago

ASIC has cancelled the AFSL of an advice firm associated with Shield and First Guardian collapses, and permanently banned its responsible manager. ...

2 weeks 5 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
1
DomaCom DFS Mortgage
92.15 3 y p.a(%)
3