Positive outlook for dividends
The outlook for dividends has improved from previous levels, which is particularly good news for investors in a low-income environment, and there is the potential for further ‘upside surprise’ in certain stocks and sectors, according to Ausbil Investment Management.
One of such sectors is banking as all four major banks, which were among the most sought-after stocks for dividend investors, were forced to cut or suspend dividends in 2020.
“With growth in deposits, a buoyant mortgage lending market and strong balance sheets, we see further recovery in bank dividends occurring over the coming year, albeit with lower payout ratios than before the pandemic,” Michael Price, portfolio manager for the Ausbil active dividend income fund, said.
Also, according to Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) data, in 2020 iron ore brought in record annual export revenue of $116 billion, which was up 20.8% on the $96 billion earned in 2019, in a boom year for the resources sector.
“Looking forward, we believe there is potential for upside surprise from both the banking and resources sectors, with plenty of valuable franking credits to be had for investors,” Price added.
“However, an active approach remains important in order to identify those companies that can produce sustainable and growing dividend income.”
AUTHOR
Oksana Patron
Recommended for you
After introducing its first active ETF to the Australian market earlier this year, BlackRock is now preparing to launch its first actively managed, income-focused ETF by the end of November.
Milford Australia has welcomed two new funds to market, driven by advisers’ need for more liquid, transparent credit solutions that meet their strong appetite for fixed income solutions.
Perennial Partners has entered into a binding agreement to take a 50 per cent stake in Balmoral Investors and appoint it as the manager of Perennial's microcap strategy.
A growing trend of factor investing in ETFs has seen the rise of smart beta or factor ETFs, but Stockspot has warned that these funds likely won’t deliver as expected and could cost investors more long-term.
