Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo
 
 

Perpetual falls back to outflows in Q2

Perpetual/pendal/asset-management/KKR/

30 January 2025
| By Laura Dew |
image
image image
expand image

Perpetual has fallen back into outflows in the second quarter of FY25, with redemptions concentrated in J O Hambro and Pendal. 

In its quarterly update for the three months to 31 December, the fund manager said it had experienced outflows of $3.8 billion during the quarter. It also saw negative market movements of $4.1 billion. 

In the previous quarter, it had reported net inflows of $0.4 billion which was the first time it had reported net inflows since the first quarter of FY24 when it saw inflows of $0.1 billion.

J O Hambro Capital Management (JOHCM) saw net outflows of $2.1 billion, Barrow Hanley lost $0.4 billion, Pendal lost $1.1 billion and TSW lost $0.3 billion. 

At Pendal, which was acquired by Perpetual in January 2023, outflows were predominantly from multi-asset, Australian equities and cash. 

However, overall AUM was up from $222.3 billion at the end of September to $230.2 billion, thanks to positive currency movements of $15.8 billion. 

In wealth management, total funds under advice was $20.6 billion, up by 1 per cent on the prior quarter, and net flows were flat. 

Chief executive Bernard Reilly said: “There was a mixed performance in the December quarter across our three businesses. In our asset management business, while AUM increased by nearly 4 per cent, supported by positive currency movements, the business was also impacted by a decline in global and US value indices over the quarter, as well as net outflows. 

“Corporate Trust delivered solid growth in funds under administration totalling 2.5 per cent, supported by growth across the majority of products and in wealth management, the business delivered growth of 1 per cent in funds under advice driven by favourable market movements.”

Regarding the firm’s planned scheme of arrangement with KKR, Perpetual said the two firms are “continuing to engage constructively” regarding the transaction. 

The scheme was placed in doubt at the end of 2024 after the Australian Taxation Office provided guidance that its primary tax liability could be as much as $488 million. Further additional penalties and interest could also cause this sum to rise by as much as a further 50 per cent. 

This meant estimated cash proceeds to shareholders from the transaction, if the scheme is implemented, would reduce from $8.38–9.82 per share to $5.74–6.42 per share.

As a result, an independent expert ruled the deal was no longer in the best interest of shareholders. 

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 1 day ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 4 days ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks 4 days ago

While the profession continues to see consolidation at the top, Adviser Ratings has compared the business models of Insignia and Entireti and how they are shaping the pro...

2 weeks 5 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND