Lonsec cautions against backing last year’s winners
While it is one of the most common investment strategies to back “last year’s winner,” research house Lonsec has warned it is very rare that asset classes consistently outperform and that backing last year’s winner could end up making a loss for investors.
Lonsec said that all too often investors pile into the best performing asset class of the last year in the hope that success will be repeated.
The table below reveals the best performing asset classes for each financial year since 2008 and shows that not every winner repeats its outperformance in the following year.
Conversely, Lonsec pointed out the table reveals that avoiding asset classes that performed poorly in the previous year can cost investors in the following year.
For example, if investors had reduced their exposure to Aussie shares following a negative return in 2012, they would have missed out on one of the better-performing asset classes in the subsequent two years (+21.9 per cent and +17.3 per cent, respectively).
“It’s a reminder that a well-researched, diversified portfolio is better over the long term than chasing last year’s winners,” Lonsec said.
Recommended for you
Infrastructure assets are well-positioned to hedge against global uncertainty and can enhance the diversification of traditional portfolios with their evergreen characteristics, an investment chief believes.
Volatility in US markets means currency is becoming a critical decision factor in Australian investors’ ETF selection this year.
Clime Investment Management is overhauling the selection process for its APLs, with managing director Michael Baragwanath describing the threat of a product failure affecting clients as “pure nightmare fuel”.
Global X will expand its ETF range of exchange-traded funds next month with a low-cost Australian equity product as it chases ambitions of becoming a top issuer of ETFs in Australia.
