Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo
 
 

Investors’ interests key to CEO salary setting

Governance/salary/ceo/AMP-Capital/

2 March 2016
| By Nicholas |
image
image image
expand image

Chief executives' salaries and bonuses should be set around their value to investors and not based on their predecessors' or global benchmarks, AMP believes.

In its latest corporate governance report, AMP Capital, reported that the average chief executive of an S&P/ASX200 company was paid more than twice what the next most senior executive received in 2015.

AMP Capital corporate governance manager, Karin Halliday, said that on average "key" S&P/ASX200 executives earned $1.4 million — excluding the chief executive.

"Chief executives deserve to be paid a premium for running a listed company in Australia as every facet of their role is crucial to investors," she said.

"As investors, we are particularly interested in the board's rationale for the size and composition of executive pay.

"Executive remuneration should be weighted towards being a fair payment for the role for which the executive has been hired. We look for evidence that executive pay is reasonable and aligned with shareholder interests.

"We recognise the challenge of setting pay, particularly when a new chief executive begins. We encourage companies to set executive pay with reference to the value the executives provide rather than simply allowing past payments or global benchmarking studies to determine future payments."

Halliday added that the report found that more than one in five boards of S&P/ASX200-listed businesses did not have a female member, noting that companies that had not embraced gender diversity were more likely to experience governance issues.

"AMP Capital believes there is a sound business case for improving gender diversity," she said.

"In addition to demonstrated links between performance and the number of women on a board, we have found that when companies have more women directors, they present fewer characteristics of poor governance."

Data from the 2015 Money Management Salary Survey found that remuneration packages for chief executives and directors within the financial services sector tended to be significantly more modest, with 92 per cent of respondents reporting they took home less than $500,000.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 2 days ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

AMP has settled on two court proceedings: one class action which affected superannuation members and a second regarding insurer policies. ...

2 days 1 hour ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 5 days ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks 5 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND