Investment firm slams ASIC’s MDA approach
Investment firm Bailey Roberts Group has slammed the regulator's approach to managed discretionary accounts (MDAs), claiming its proposals would decrease independent advice and increase client risk.
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has recently announced it was reviewing its guidance on MDAs, outlining its renewed approach in Consultation Paper 200: Updates to RG 179.
ASIC's main proposals include a more detailed and specific upfront disclosure from MDA operators on key issues, and an update to the financial requirements for operators.
The main reason for the review, ASIC said, was the recent growth in the number of offerings and increased interest from financial planners as a result of the Future of Financial Advice (FOFA) reforms.
However, Bailey Roberts Group chief executive officer Ian Bailey and director Leith Thomas suggested in their submission to the regulator that the growth of the MDA sector was not due to FOFA reforms.
"The growth of the self-managed superannuation funds (SMSF) sector, the inability to liquidate managed funds post GFC and the increase in low cost technology to manage MDA portfolios would also seem compelling arguments for change," the submission read.
"ASIC's FOFA argument may be opinion, not fact."
As a result, Bailey and Thomas said, advisers have sought solutions to manage assets efficiently.
"This includes the ability to act on a discretionary basis."
Bailey Roberts Group claimed the current proposals by ASIC did not differentiate between direct investments and those held in custody.
At the core of its concerns was the fact that the regulator viewed all MDAs as the same, when the risk profiles of differing models varied greatly, the group said.
Recommended for you
Infrastructure assets are well-positioned to hedge against global uncertainty and can enhance the diversification of traditional portfolios with their evergreen characteristics, an investment chief believes.
Volatility in US markets means currency is becoming a critical decision factor in Australian investors’ ETF selection this year.
Clime Investment Management is overhauling the selection process for its APLs, with managing director Michael Baragwanath describing the threat of a product failure affecting clients as “pure nightmare fuel”.
Global X will expand its ETF range of exchange-traded funds next month with a low-cost Australian equity product as it chases ambitions of becoming a top issuer of ETFs in Australia.
