Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo
 
 

Hybrid property gets a wrap

property/compliance/lonsec/fund-manager/mercer/

23 February 2006
| By Liam Egan |

Melbourne-based research house Lonsec has delivered an upbeat assessment of hybrid property products.

“High-yielding direct assets with liquidity have long been seen as the ‘holy grail’ of property investment, and we believe that hybrid property funds squarely meet these investment criteria,” said Lonsec senior researcher Pete Morrissey.

“Hybrid property fundamentals of strong income with low volatility appear well suited to a wide range of investors, with the asset allocation decision (direct or listed) providing an additional level to assess management skill,” he said.

Eight hybrid property funds have appeared in Lonsec’s inaugural review of the emerging unlisted funds sector, which it claims is the first review of its type by an independent researcher.

A “proliferation of hybrid property products in 2005 provided an expanded universe against which to undertake the first peer review of this evolving sector”, Morrissey said.

The funds included in the review would provide financial planners with an “array of quality funds having a diverse range of investment attributes and processes to furnish individual client requirements”, Morrissey said.

The Lonsec Hybrid Property Index has been created to conduct the reviews, based on a 50 per cent weighting to the S&P/ASX 200 Property Trusts Accumulation Index, and a 50 per cent weighting to the Mercer Unlisted Property Funds Index (net of fees).

Lonsec’s analysis indicates that the variation in risk and return for direct and listed property “can be significant” when compared to Lonsec’s Hybrid Property Index, Morrissey said.

“There is therefore a strong case for investing in hybrid property on a risk-adjusted return basis relative to the pure forms of direct or listed property.”

Lonsec’s ratings assessment includes both qualitative and quantitative factors, notwithstanding the limited history of most funds in the review, which are scored separately and combined to determine an overall rating.

Qualitative factors include the strength of the investment process, research methodology, experience of the investment team, compliance, portfolio construction and business strength.

Quantitative analysis draws on a fund manager’s past performance, with Lonsec applying a range of measures to assess both risk and return.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

3 days ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

3 weeks 6 days ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month ago

After last month’s surprise hold, the Reserve Bank of Australia has announced its latest interest rate decision....

4 weeks 1 day ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

5 days 18 hours ago

While the profession continues to see consolidation at the top, Adviser Ratings has compared the business models of Insignia and Entireti and how they are shaping the pro...

2 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND