GameStop frenzy unlikely to have a lasting impact

5 February 2021
| By Laura Dew |
image
image
expand image

Last week’s Gamestop hype is unlikely to have a fundamental impact on markets, according to commentators, and more likely to be pure noise.

Shares in video game retailer GameStop were pushed over 1,900% in three weeks by users of the website Reddit in order to cause hedge funds who had shorted the stock to lose money. However, they later fell again after trading platforms moved to restrict trading of the stock.

The price of the stock peaked at US$480 ($628), with a market cap of US$35 billion, but was now trading at less than US$100.

Shane Oliver, chief economist at AMP Capital, said: “The frenzy of US retail day traders pushing up stocks that have been shorted by high-profile hedge funds causing their prices to surge is creating a lot of noise and messing up the shorting strategies of some hedge funds, but it’s unlikely to have a lasting fundamental impact.

“Ultimately if the hedge funds were fundamentally right then the stocks will go down and the day traders will get very badly burned and feel that they have been manipulated by the chat room chatter than got them in the first place (in fact maybe they were) which will serve to damp down such activity in the future.”

“The challenges with COVID-19 on our ability to work and our lives has now created another wave of new market participants with traders now speculating on apps that makes trading appear like a game as well as chat forums ramping up the price of speculative stocks. As always, it is the young or less experienced that are attracted to this in the hopes of making a fortune,” Dale Gillham, chief analyst at Wealth Within, said

Paul O’Connor, head of the multi-asset team at Janus Henderson, said: “While these brawls between retail speculators and hedge funds have been distracting and at times entertaining, we see them more as being localised tussles over a few highly-contested stocks (with high short interest and options exposures) than something with broader or enduring market significance. The overall impact on long-only investors, quant funds and macro investors has been modest”.

However, O’Connor indicated the events might encourage regulators, particularly in the US, to take tougher action on the activities of day traders.

Last week’s Gamestop hype is unlikely to have a fundamental impact on markets, according to commentators, and more likely to be pure noise.

Shares in video game retailer GameStop were pushed over 1,900% in three weeks by users of the website Reddit in order to cause hedge funds who had shorted the stock to lose money. However, they later fell again after trading platforms moved to restrict trading of the stock.

The price of the stock peaked at US$480 ($628), with a market cap of US$35 billion, but was now trading at less than US$100.

Shane Oliver, chief economist at AMP Capital, said: “The frenzy of US retail day traders pushing up stocks that have been shorted by high-profile hedge funds causing their prices to surge is creating a lot of noise and messing up the shorting strategies of some hedge funds, but it’s unlikely to have a lasting fundamental impact.

“Ultimately if the hedge funds were fundamentally right then the stocks will go down and the day traders will get very badly burned and feel that they have been manipulated by the chat room chatter than got them in the first place (in fact maybe they were) which will serve to damp down such activity in the future.”

“The challenges with COVID-19 on our ability to work and our lives has now created another wave of new market participants with traders now speculating on apps that makes trading appear like a game as well as chat forums ramping up the price of speculative stocks. As always, it is the young or less experienced that are attracted to this in the hopes of making a fortune,” Dale Gillham, chief analyst at Wealth Within, said

Paul O’Connor, head of the multi-asset team at Janus Henderson, said: “While these brawls between retail speculators and hedge funds have been distracting and at times entertaining, we see them more as being localised tussles over a few highly-contested stocks (with high short interest and options exposures) than something with broader or enduring market significance. The overall impact on long-only investors, quant funds and macro investors has been modest”.

However, O’Connor indicated the events might encourage regulators, particularly in the US, to take tougher action on the activities of day traders.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Squeaky'21

My view is that after 2026 there will be quite a bit less than 10,000 'advisers' (investment advisers) and less than 100...

1 week ago
Jason Warlond

Dugald makes a great point that not everyone's definition of green is the same and gives a good example. Funds have bee...

1 week ago
Jasmin Jakupovic

How did they get the AFSL in the first place? Given the green light by ASIC. This is terrible example of ASIC's incompet...

1 week 1 day ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 1 week ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 2 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND