External credit ratings not the be-all
Asset managers need to step away from an overreliance on external credit ratings when making investment decisions, according to the International Organisation of Securities Commissions (IOSCO).
In its final report on ‘Good practices on reducing reliance on CRAs in Asset Management', IOSCO said asset managers use external ratings due to demand, as dependence on external ratings remains on the investor side.
"References to external credit ratings may derive from regulatory requirements or an investor's own internal rules," IOSCO said.
"This may result in mechanistic reliance, which could trigger forced asset sales in the event of downgrades."
IOSCO made eight recommendations for the Financial Stability Board to decrease the reliance on external ratings.
It said asset managers should make judgements on their own as to the credit quality of a financial instrument before investing and through the holding period.
It also said external credit ratings should only form one part of the internal assessment process instead of being the only factor supporting credit analysis.
IOSCO also said a downgrade in external credit ratings should not automatically result in the immediate sale of the asset. If the manager/board do divest, the transaction should occur in a period that is in the best interests of the investors.
IOSCO urged regulators to find a way to translate the principles into specific policy actions to end the mechanistic dependence on ratings by banks, institutional investors and other market participants.
AUTHOR
Malavika Santhebennur
Recommended for you
With wealth managers and advisers having minimal capacity for fund research, a BNY report has found simple alternatives strategies from established providers are those which resonate best with that audience.
Platinum Asset Management has seen its third major client withdrawal this year, flagging a large client will redeem $580 million by November.
ETF provider BlackRock has redefined its underlying investment strategy for the iShares Future Tech Innovators ETF and almost halved the management fees as it continues its local iShares product suite review.
Natixis affiliate IML has launched an active ETF aimed at retirees and income-focused investors, while Loftus Peak has unveiled a hedged version of its Global Disruption ETF.
