Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo
 
 

ASIC seeks restraining orders against trading company and director

ASIC/ASX/NAB/

18 March 2016
| By Staff |
image
image image
expand image

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) is seeking orders restraining a trading company and its principal from financial services over concerns of market manipulation.

In a notice of filing, ASIC alleged that Whitebox Trading Pty Ltd, and its sole director and principal, Johannes Boshoff, while contracted by the National Australia Bank Limited (NAB) to provide index arbitrage trading software in 2012, placed orders that contravened sections 1041A and 1041B of the Act by placing and cancelling orders for XJO Securities on the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX) on 19 April 2012 and placing and amending orders for XJO Securities on ASX on each of 17 May 2012, 19 July 2012, and 18 October 2012 that were likely to have the effect of creating artificial prices for trading XJO Securities on the ASX and had, or were likely to have, the effect of creating, or causing the creation of, a false or misleading appearance with respect to the market for XJO Securities on the ASX and were likely to have the effect of creating, or causing the creation of, a false or misleading appearance with respect to the price for trading XJO Securities on the ASX.

ASIC also alleged that false or misleading appearances as to market for Index Securities were created by orders that Boshoff and Whitebox had placed on the ASX but did not intend to trade.

ASIC has sought:

Declarations that Mr Boshoff and Whitebox contravened provisions of the Corporations Act

Orders that they pay penalties to the Commonwealth, and

That they be restrained from providing financial services for a defined period.

The regulator claimed that Whitebox had been contracted to provide index arbitrage trading software and services to National Australia Bank Limited and the relevant order activities were conducted by Whitebox's trading personnel, including Boshoff, while providing those services.

On 23 December 2013, ASIC accepted an enforceable undertaking (EU) from NAB in relation to its responsibility for the alleged market misconduct of Whitebox's trading personnel.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 2 days ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 4 days ago

AMP has settled on two court proceedings: one class action which affected superannuation members and a second regarding insurer policies. ...

1 day 22 hours ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks 5 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND