AICD wants broader definition of ‘independent directors’ for super funds

funds-management/independent-directors/

19 October 2015
| By Staff |
image
image image
expand image

The Australian Institute of Company Directors (AICD) has backed legislation for independent directors to be appointed to super funds, but wants the definition to be consistent with other APRA-regulated entities.

In a submission to the Senate Economic Legislation Committee, AICD chief executive, John Brogden, said the definition proposed in the Superannuation Legislation Amendment (Trustee Governance) Bill 2015, was overly "prescriptive".

"As noted in our previous submission to Treasury the exposure draft the Superannuation Legislation Amendment (Trustee Governance) Bill 2015, it is our long-held view that, greater independence on the boards of superannuation trustee companies should be encouraged, consistent with internationally recognised principles of good governance," he said.

"Our submission recommended that a broader definition of ‘independent' be adopted under the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SIS Act) for directors of superannuation trustee companies, similar to the one that is used for the purposes of Principle 2 under the ASX Corporate Governance Council's Corporate Governance Principles and Recommendations, namely: ‘an independent director is a non-executive director who is not a member of management and who is free of any business or other relationship that could materially interfere with — or could reasonably be perceived to materially interfere with — the independent exercise of their judgement.

"We would again ask that consideration be given to including a broader definition in the Bill and that specific examples of the relationships that will be considered by APRA to impact a director's independence be included in the relevant Prudential Standard.

"Not only would this approach be consistent with the approach taken for all other financial entities regulated by APRA, including the detail in the Prudential Standard will mean that they can be more easily changed as corporate governance practice evolves, as opposed to legislation."

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 4 days ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

AMP has settled on two court proceedings: one class action which affected superannuation members and a second regarding insurer policies. ...

4 days 17 hours ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

2 weeks ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

3 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo