Is wealth paying dividends for banks?

3 November 2015
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

New research conducted by Ernst and Young (EY) has questioned the returns on investment being achieved from wealth management by the major banks.

The EY Banking Agenda report, released this week, drew upon the results of all the major banking groups to suggest that generating return on equity (ROE) remained a challenge for the banks due to the capital intensive nature of the business.

Importantly, the EY analysis has come less than a week following National Australia Bank's announcement that it will be selling 80 per cent of its life insurance business to Nippon.

Looking at the state of the wealth elements of the banking industry, the EY report said the banks' wealth businesses had benefitted from a strong performance in investment markets for most of the year and a lower Australian dollar.

It said that insurance premiums increased due to repricing but this had been offset in part by higher general insurance claims due to severe weather events.

As well, the report noted that the wealth businesses of the banks had been the subject of conduct issues related to the provision of financial advice and that while the customer remediation costs have been minimal, the major cost to the banks has been reputation.

"It is therefore no surprise that the Government's response to the FSI endorsed the recommendations regarding financial advice," it said.

Dealing with the challenge of generating acceptable ROE, the report said that expensive life insurance underwriting and manufacturing operations were likely to come under review as banks looked for ways to free up capital and improve returns.

"Divestments and strategic partnerships will enable the banks to focus on more profitable product distribution," it said.

The EY report said banks were also looking to implement more cost effective technology-enabled sales and advice in their wealth operations.

"With the rise of robo-advice, a digital financial advice revolution is underway that will help bridge the gap between what regular households are willing to pay for advice and what advisers are willing to charge for advice, and increase the consistency of advice."

 

 

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Squeaky'21

My view is that after 2026 there will be quite a bit less than 10,000 'advisers' (investment advisers) and less than 100...

1 week ago
Jason Warlond

Dugald makes a great point that not everyone's definition of green is the same and gives a good example. Funds have bee...

1 week ago
Jasmin Jakupovic

How did they get the AFSL in the first place? Given the green light by ASIC. This is terrible example of ASIC's incompet...

1 week 1 day ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 1 week ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 2 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND