Synchron calls FSC remuneration model anti-competitive

insurance/financial-planning/FPA/government-and-regulation/FSC/AFA/association-of-financial-advisers/life-insurance/financial-services-council/financial-advisers/financial-planning-association/australian-securities-and-investments-commission/money-management/director/

12 November 2012
| By Staff |
image
image image
expand image

Synchron director Don Trapnell said his company would never support a model for adviser remuneration that was imposed by a cohort of life insurance companies and the Financial Services Council (FSC), but would adopt a model if it were driven by competitive forces.

"What we are seeing now is life insurance companies, via their association with the FSC, working together to form a policy that imposes a uniform remuneration model with uniform responsibility periods on advisers.

"That is anti-competitive and Synchron will never support that kind of behaviour," he said.

Trapnell said changes to responsibility periods had been driven by competitive pressures in the past. 

Competition should continue to dictate any further changes in adviser periods, he said.

The FSC's proposal includes a claw-back arrangement where 100 per cent of upfront commissions are returned to the insurance company in the case of a policy lapsing within the first year, 75 per cent if it lapses within two years and 50 per cent if it lapses in the third.

Trapnell said insurance policies lapsed for a variety of reasons.

"This is not the fault of the advisers and advisers should not be penalised for it," he said.

While a Money Management forum last month found churning was not as widespread as many industry critics suggested, the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) said its work had identified it as a real problem and supported the FSC's proposal.

Both the Association of Financial Advisers (AFA) and the Financial Planning Association (FPA) have supported elements of the proposal; however, the most contentious issue for advisers has been around the claw-back provisions.

Suggestions by the AFA, FPA and respondents at Money Management's forum indicated the most likely resolution was a hybrid remuneration model.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

5 months 3 weeks ago

Glad to see the back of you Steve. You made financial more expensive, not more affordable as you claim, and presided ...

6 months ago

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

8 months ago

The RBA has handed down its much-anticipated rate decision, following widespread expectations of a close call....

3 weeks 4 days ago

Despite the financial adviser exam being rooted in ethics, two professional year advisers believe the lack of support and transparency from the regulator around the exam ...

2 weeks 3 days ago

ASIC has banned two advisers from the same advice firm for giving clients inappropriate superannuation advice that was not in their best interests. ...

3 weeks 3 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
1
DomaCom DFS Mortgage
88.01 3 y p.a(%)
3