Super trustees not getting free ride: ASIC



|
Super trustees providing limited advice aren’t being given “a free ride”, a representative from the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has stressed.
Speaking at this year’s Investment and Financial Services Association (IFSA) conference on the Gold Coast, Deborah Koromilas, senior executive leader, financial advisers, said while trustees would have relief from financial services regulation (FSR), such relief would not be available at common law.
“If you don't give advice that is appropriate to your client, your client can sue you for the fact that this advice is negligent. Now that has nothing to do with the Corporations Act,” Koromilas said.
“The Corporations Act merely puts into legislation a standard in relation to negligent advice. So to think that somehow somebody's been given a free ride here because they don't have to meet a standard in the legislation is really a misunderstanding of the concept that there's another piece of law out there that you still have to adhere to,” she told delegates.
Acknowledging that negligence laws could only attract civil penalties, Koromilas said the important issue was improving access to advice.
She further argued there was benefit in the limited advice to planners in terms of stripping down compliance layers and lowering the cost of advice.
Limited advice is within the realm of personal advice, Koromilas said.
Recommended for you
National advice firm MiQ Private Wealth has appointed a new chief executive to lead the business through a “transformative era” after penning a partnership deal with AZ NGA earlier this month.
With an advice M&A deal taking around six months to enact, two experts have shared their tips on how buyers and sellers can avoid “deal fatigue” and prevent potential deals from collapsing.
Several financial advisers have been shortlisted in the ninth annual Women in Finance Awards 2025, to be held on 14 November.
Digital advice tools are on the rise, but licensees will need to ensure they still meet adviser obligations or potentially risk a class action if clients lose money from a rogue algorithm.