Successors should not have to pay cash
Phil Guest solved his succession planning problems by simply giving away shares in his financial planning practice. He decided that, while there were successors to his business, Guest McLeod, in place, they couldn’t afford to buy a stake in the company.
“The myth is that the initial successor must pay hard cash for the business,” he says.
“I transferred a section of the business to the successor. Initially I gave 5 per cent of the business but over a 10-year vesting scale.”
After five years the successor got another 5 per cent, again vested for 10 years and, after seven years another 5 per cent. The vesting period ensured the successor stayed with the business.
In Guest’s case, there were two successors. One left and sold his stake to the other successor. Subsequent successors have taken up similar offers and Guest now owns 40 per cent of the company. The rest is with his successors.
“Today my 40 per cent is worth eight times more than the 100 per cent company I owned a few years ago,” Guest says.
“The successor receives dividends and they have a feeling of ownership which helps you retain them in the business.”
The key to finding someone to become your successor starts on day one, Guest says.
When Tim Rossell joined as the graduate apprentice, it was because Guest was overloaded with work.
“I set him working on the AAA clients’ not the discards. He spent time working with me on these clients as it freed me up to see more AAA clients,” Guest says.
The rationale was it also freed Guest from some of the back office operations, worth $10 an hour, and left him to continuing earning $500 an hour with quality clients.
“We now had everybody working for the corporate good and in our case one plus one equalled five,” Guest says.
Guest McLeod now has a continuing successor plan, each new graduate bringing different skills to the practice, which boosts profitability.
“The successors now have a stimulating career and, for the senior adviser, there is now a planned and profitable exit strategy,” Guest says.
Recommended for you
The month of April enjoyed four back-to-back weeks of growth in financial adviser numbers, with this past week seeing a net rise of five.
ASIC has permanently banned a former Perth adviser after he made “materially misleading” statements to induce investors.
The Financial Services and Credit Panel has made a written order to a relevant provider after it gave advice regarding non-concessional contributions.
With the election taking place on Saturday (3 May), Adviser Ratings examines how the two major parties could shape the advice industry in the future.
