Shorter dispute resolution timeframes
Lenders, including providers of margin loans, will be required to deal with credit disputes in less than half the time previously allowed to them under new dispute resolution arrangements announced by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC).
The regulator announced on Friday that under the new disputes resolution regime shorter resolution timeframes would be applied and that instead of the current maximum 45 days for handling disputes, those involving default notices would need to be handled inside a maximum of 21 days.
In announcing the new regime, ASIC said it considered the timeframes would allow the industry sufficient time to address disputes at the internal dispute resolution level while providing a quick response for consumers under significant emotional and financial stress.
The ASIC announcement said that under the new national credit regime, credit representatives, unlike authorised representatives of Australian Financial Services (AFS) licensees, would be required to be separate members of external dispute resolution schemes (EDRs).
It said to reduce confusion for consumers, the EDR scheme of the credit licensee had to be used as the EDR scheme of the first instance.
ASIC said this approach would help reduce consumer confusion about where to complain, streamline compensation arrangements and best align with current dispute resolution requirements for AFS licences, particularly where a credit representative is also an authorised representative of an AFS licensee.
AUTHOR
Mike Taylor
Recommended for you
ASIC has accepted a court enforceable undertaking from a Perth-based company auditor who failed to adequately conduct multiple audits on an advice firm that receivers say has $100 million missing.
After a brutal month for adviser numbers, the net loss for June now stands at more than 100 advisers, but the financial year is still on track to end in positive territory.
Two advice platforms have been identified by Adviser Ratings as standouts for efficiency as time-pressured advisers become evermore fickle in their platform selection.
Private wealth manager Escala Partners has increased its alternatives allocations to more than a third in the past three years, describing the asset class as offering “fertile ground” for diversification.
