Shine joins line of lawyers after AMP

Less than a week after announcing that it intends to “vigorously defend” itself against mounting class actions, AMP has been hit with another claim against it on behalf of shareholders, this time by Shine Lawyers.

This latest class action would again focus on the revelations about AMP’s misconduct uncovered by the Royal Commission into Misconduct in the Banking, Superannuation and Financial Services Industry last month.

Shine Lawyers said that their case would allege that AMP engaged in misleading and deceptive conduct, false and dishonest conduct and failed to disclose information to the market, saying that the exposure of this by the Commission “cause the share price [of AMP] to drop by 10.2 per cent”.

Related News:

The law firm was yet to file proceedings in this matter, but were completing due diligence and had secured funding from major UK litigation funder, Augusta Ventures Limited.

Shine class actions expert, Jan Saddler, said that the class action could help shareholders who purchased shares in AMP from 24 May, 2013 to 20 April, 2018 recover some losses.

“Shareholders feel rightly aggrieved by the revelations of AMP at the Royal Commission. Shine is looking forward to assisting shareholders to recover some of the losses they have suffered as a result of the scandalous decision-making that has occurred at AMP over a number of years,” Saddler said.

“We are confident that the funding package proposed by Augusta Ventures and Shine will maximise net returns for investors seeking redress against AMP, and we look forward to helping those investors obtain the compensation they are due.”

Both Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan and Phi Finney McDonald had already filed class actions against AMP, in the Supreme Court of New South Wales and the Federal Court respectively.




Related Content

RC took its toll on fin services workers

It seems as if the Royal Commission has taken its toll on the financial services industry, with over a quarter of industry workers experiencing extrem...Read more

FPA issues PI warning on legacy AFCA complaints

The Financial Planning Association (FPA) has formally expressed concern about whether professional indemnity insurance will cover legacy complaints be...Read more

Compensation scheme is treating symptoms not causes

The need for a compensation scheme of last resort is highly debateable in circumstances where most of the problems lie with 44 separate, small and und...Read more

Author

Comments

Comments

Perhaps we need the government to change the law and limit legal fees to 3% of any payout. if super fees have to be less than 3% surely legal fees should follow the same logic. Sometimes it seems that '4 corners" could usefully spend time looking at class action legal fees verse payouts to the poor people who suffered. (But who would manage the royal commission - lawyers would have a conflict of interest .....)

Would the last one to leave Shine Lawyers turn out the light? Mar 23 2017 at 10:30 PM. Disappointed in AMP but they say people who live in glass houses shouldn’t throw stones.

Add new comment