Risk Committee's non-disclosure stance slammed

commissions/insurance/disclosure/government/FPA/life-insurance/

25 September 2003
| By Anonymous (not verified) |

TheJoint Parliamentary Committee inquiry into commissions on risk products has veered away from recommending mandatory disclosure rules for risk advisers, warning that to do so may force many small businesses to close down or downsize.

The stance, however, has been slammed by many in the industry, with the Australian Consumers’ Association (ACA) labelling the exemption on disclosure of fees for risk advisers a “disgrace”.

“The Committee is concerned that competition may be stymied in this environment and fail to deliver benefits to consumers that would be expected from a properly functioning market,” the report says.

However the ACA has urged the Government to reject — for the third time — the committee’s call for an exemption and “stick to its guns”, while theFinancial Planning Association(FPA) has also vetoed the findings and argued that a universal commitment to disclosure of commissions is imperative.

ACA finance policy officer Catherine Wolthuizen says the recommendation to exempt life insurance agents and other vendors of risk insurance from the commission disclosure requirements of the Financial Services Reform Act “flies in the face of the basic transparency and accountability principles which underpin the Government’s new regulatory framework for financial services”.

In a dissenting report, welcomed by both the FPA and the ACA, the Australian Labor Party members of the Parliamentary Committee argued that risk advisers should be subject to the full mandatory disclosure regime.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

2 months 3 weeks ago

Glad to see the back of you Steve. You made financial more expensive, not more affordable as you claim, and presided ...

3 months ago

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

5 months ago

ASIC has suspended the Australian Financial Services Licence of a Melbourne-based financial advice firm....

2 weeks 1 day ago

The corporate regulator has issued infringement notices to three AFSLs whose financial advisers provided personal advice to a retail client while unregistered....

3 weeks ago

ASIC has released the results of its first adviser exam to be held in 2025, with 241 candidates attempting the test....

3 weeks 5 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND