Revisit conflicted remuneration, not risk commissions, policymakers told
Instead of targeting commissions for life insurance products, policy reforms should revisit conflicted remuneration, which hasn’t been properly handled by the Future of Financial Advice (FOFA), wealth advisory firm Chan & Naylor believes.
The firm says removing life insurance commissions entirely would lead to chronic underinsurance and suggested policy makers turn their attention elsewhere, with commission-removal labeled an ineffective reform.
“However the existing framework is robust enough to prevent risk advisers churning policies, and if commissions were removed altogether in lieu of a service fee then this would not correlate to a one-to-one premium saving for the client,” David Hasib, a Partner at Chan & Naylor Wealth Planning, said.
He also said risk commissions are justified by the amount of work risk advisers put into investigating certain products and policies.
Hasib called for the industry to take a closer look at conflicted remuneration, which he said was not handled thoroughly enough under FOFA.
“If we can remove the inherent, product selling culture of the 80s & 90s, then it will be to the benefit of all Australians,” he said.
Recommended for you
As advisers risk losing two-thirds of FUA during the $3.5 trillion wealth transfer, two co-founders underscore why fostering trust with the next generation is vital to retaining intergenerational wealth.
As advisers seek greater insights into FSCP determinations, what are the various options considered by the panel and can a decision be appealed?
Amid the current financial adviser shortage, advice firm Link Wealth is looking to expand its financial literacy program for high school students across the country.
TAL Risk Academy has updated its range of ethics courses to help financial advisers meet their CPD requirements following adviser feedback, including interpreting FSCP determinations.
