Product intervention power will increase cost of advice

28 August 2018
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

Handing the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) product intervention powers could end up restricting advisers as a result of licensees limiting the number of offerings on approved product lists (APLs), according to the Association of Financial Advisers (AFA).

In a submission filed with the Treasury this month, the AFA said it was concerned that the impact of this legislation would be a reduction in the breadth of APLs as licensees sought to avoid the unnecessary complexity that would arise in having a broad APL and where an adviser might want to recommend a non-approved product.

“The impact of this is a reduction in competition and choice for consumers,” it said.

The AFA also expressed concern about the manner in which the proposed product intervention power would impact the cost of providing financial advice, particularly where record-keeping and other administrative obligations were concerned.

“We note that the Regulatory Impact statement demonstrates a cost to business of $94.7 million, which is a significant reduction on the $239 million set out in the December 2017 version,” the submission said.

“We remain disappointed that there is a total lack of detail in terms of the breakdown of this $94.7 million and we are concerned that the majority of it will sit with distributors and financial advisers in particular,” it said.

The AFA said the cost increase from the legislation would come on top of a number of other recent regulatory-driven increases which would impact upon the cost of providing financial advice to Australian consumers and would therefore negatively influence access to financial advice for average Australians.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Squeaky'21

My view is that after 2026 there will be quite a bit less than 10,000 'advisers' (investment advisers) and less than 100...

4 days 18 hours ago
Jason Warlond

Dugald makes a great point that not everyone's definition of green is the same and gives a good example. Funds have bee...

4 days 19 hours ago
Jasmin Jakupovic

How did they get the AFSL in the first place? Given the green light by ASIC. This is terrible example of ASIC's incompet...

5 days 18 hours ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 1 week ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

8 months 4 weeks ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 1 week ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND