Planner skill not enough to assess client risks

financial planning risk management

22 September 2015
| By Jason |
image
image
expand image

Financial planners relying on clients to provide information about risk appetites and aversion to loss are like doctors allowing patients to self-report their medical conditions and then treating them on the basis of that information.

Even relying on well-established adviser-client relationship is not enough either to ascertain these issues according to University of California, Berkley, Economics Department Chair and Capital Preferences, Chief Scientist, Shachar Kariv.

Kariv, who has been involved in research into behavioural and experimental economics focused on individual preferences and attitudes towards risk and time, said for many clients articulating what their preferences are around aversion to risk and loss was hard and that clients often used language and ideas differently than their advisers.

"It is like riding a bike, which people can easily do but it becomes harder to describe how it is done compared with showing how it is done," Kariv said.

"People have their own objectives and constraints and the question is how to meet those objectives within those constraints and then to create a portfolio."

He said survey based tools which assess risk tolerance, risk aversion and risk ambiguity but failed to have a mathematical base for what was included and produced was an inconsistent approach in financial services.

"We build things in many areas based on the best models, except in financial advice. If we collect data but have no basis for it, or create an arbitrary basis for it, then the range and rating of that data has no meaning," Kariv said.

"As a result, clients can be wrongly classified and assessed and advisers have no real basis to prove why they the risk position of a client was assessed in the way it was."

"There are norms in all professions that are universally accepted, but the idea that an adviser can understand their clients purely by their own skill and entrepreneurial approach is hubris and wrong."

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

3 weeks ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

3 weeks 4 days ago

It’s astonishing to see the FAAA now pushing for more advisers by courting "career changers" and international recruits,...

1 month 2 weeks ago

A former Brisbane financial adviser has been charged with 26 counts of dishonest conduct regarding a failure to disclose he would receive substantial commission payments ...

3 weeks 3 days ago

Pinnacle Investment Management has announced it will acquire strategic interests in two international fund managers for $142 million....

3 weeks 2 days ago

Financial Services Minister Stephen Jones has shared further details on the second tranche of the Delivering Better Financial Outcomes reforms including modernising best ...

1 week 3 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS