One-in-three report negative effect on finances from COVID-19
One-in-three households say they are financially worse-off as a result of COVID-19 with more than half of people saying they used stimulus payments to top-up their savings.
According to the Australian Bureau of Statistics, which examined data between mid-March and mid-April, nearly half of people (45%) surveyed had had their household finances impacted by the pandemic.
Some 31% said this had been a negative impact while 14% had seen an improvement.
Others reported suffering ‘financial hardship’ with 7.5% lacking sufficient money to pay bills and 10% needing to use savings for basic living expenses.
Some 28% said they had already received the $750 economic support payment, particularly those aged over 65. The percentage of people in this demographic who had received a payment stood at 60% compared to a 19% for those aged 18-64.
Over half of stimulus recipients said they added the payment to their savings.
The survey also questioned recipients’ wellbeing and found twice as many as adults had reported experienced anxiety over the four-week period compared to results in 2017-18.
To boost their spirits in lockdown, 65% of respondents said they had increased their contact with friends and family outside of their household, the most-common methods being telephone, instant messaging or video calls.
AUTHOR
Laura Dew
Recommended for you
ETF provider VanEck has announced its intention to launch a uranium and energy solution as global political agendas point to expansion in this sector.
PIMCO has announced the launch of a new active fixed-income ETF, marking its fifth active solution on the Australian market after the launch of four ETFs earlier in the year.
With the Australian advice market being a target for US private equity firms, a US advice commentator has shared lessons from his overseas experience, and why PE may be less attractive than initially expected.
Financial advisers are reminded to ensure their CPD is up to date with the Financial Services and Credit Panel making its second determination in a week after an adviser failed to meet the requirements.
