More transparency on securities lending
|
|
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) intends moving to make securities lending transactions more transparent to the market.
The regulator made its objectives clear on Friday when releasing a consultation paper on securities lending and substantial holding disclosure, within which it said: “We are concerned there has been a lack of transparency of substantial holdings acquired through securities lending transactions and prime broking arrangements."
However, at the same time as urging more transparency, the regulator acknowledges there will be cost and competition impacts on those involved.
The discussion paper said there appeared to be differing interpretations of how the relevant interest provisions of the Corporations Act work with respect to securities lending and prime broking and that this, in turn, had contributed to difference practices for compliance.
It said the different practices had, in turn, led to a lack of transparency in the ownership and control of listed entities and had “undermined an efficient and informed market”.
The regulator has made clear in the discussion paper that it will be seeking greater detail within paperwork attaching to securities lending, more transparency with respect to the consideration received for lending securities and clarity around counter-party arrangements.
AUTHOR
Mike Taylor
Recommended for you
As advisers risk losing two-thirds of FUA during the $3.5 trillion wealth transfer, two co-founders underscore why fostering trust with the next generation is vital to retaining intergenerational wealth.
As advisers seek greater insights into FSCP determinations, what are the various options considered by the panel and can a decision be appealed?
Amid the current financial adviser shortage, advice firm Link Wealth is looking to expand its financial literacy program for high school students across the country.
TAL Risk Academy has updated its range of ethics courses to help financial advisers meet their CPD requirements following adviser feedback, including interpreting FSCP determinations.
