Merged practices struggle to resolve conflicts
The number of merged practices deciding to end their relationships will continue to increase in the months ahead due to the lack of clear conflict resolution arrangements, according to Seaview Consulting director David Fotheringham.
Fotheringham said the firm had became aware of five practice partnership arrangements across the financial planning and funds management space in dispute over the future direction of the businesses last year.
With some financial services businesses looking for exits in the face of increased operational costs and compliance obligations, Fotheringham said the process becomes that much more difficult when it involves two or more parties.
"It's just like a marriage — there's good intentions when you start out but five years on circumstances change and you need to look forward and ask what's the best proposition to go down," he said.
He said in a low growth environment, the ability of financial practitioners to manage a good business was as vital as being a good technical adviser.
"That's what's triggering the troubles, because one or both parties are simply not getting enough out of it given the effort they're putting into it," he said.
Organisations need to ensure their exit provisions have a clear process for conflict resolution as well as dissolution should the business partnership disintegrate, Fotheringham said.
Recommended for you
With wealth management M&A appetite only growing stronger, Business Health has outlined the major considerations for buyers and sellers to prevent unintended misalignment between the parties.
Industry body SIAA has said the falling number of financial advisers in Australia is a key issue impacting the attractiveness and investor participation of both public and private markets.
As advisers risk losing two-thirds of FUA during the $3.5 trillion wealth transfer, two co-founders underscore why fostering trust with the next generation is vital to retaining intergenerational wealth.
As advisers seek greater insights into FSCP determinations, what are the various options considered by the panel and can a decision be appealed?
