Lifestyle investing flawed
A Griffith University academic has claimed that the so-called “lifecycle investing” strategy utilised by many superannuation funds is badly flawed.
Professor of Finance Michael Drew said that lifestyle investing had the potential to leave investors worse off in retirement than would be the case if they had pursued alternative strategies.
“The model works on the principle of adopting high risk strategies younger in life, then working towards the reverse closer towards retirement,” Drew said.
“The investments are put on autopilot, changing gears driven by age, with the promising of gliding in softly to land at retirement.”
However, he said the model did not take account of external factors such as the current market downturn.
Drew said that he and another Queensland academic, Dr Anup Basu had challenged the lifestyle investing approach based on more than 100 years’ of financial return data and found it to be potentially risky in terms of failing to meet the retirement saving goals of many investors.
“Selling when the market is low as it has been this year just because you’ve turned 45 doesn’t make sense,” he said.
AUTHOR
Mike Taylor
Recommended for you
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has confirmed who will succeed Stephen Jones to serve as the Assistant Treasurer and Financial Services Minister.
Those financial advice practices which are seeing the strongest profitability and revenue growth share four similar characteristics in how they run their businesses.
The director of Ascent Investment and Coaching, Michael Dunjey, has been charged with 33 criminal offences.
Private wealth manager LGT Crestone has shared how the firm is utilising private debt strategies via a satellite approach and encouraged advisers to look beyond domestic commercial real estate.
