Lifestyle investing flawed
A Griffith University academic has claimed that the so-called “lifecycle investing” strategy utilised by many superannuation funds is badly flawed.
Professor of Finance Michael Drew said that lifestyle investing had the potential to leave investors worse off in retirement than would be the case if they had pursued alternative strategies.
“The model works on the principle of adopting high risk strategies younger in life, then working towards the reverse closer towards retirement,” Drew said.
“The investments are put on autopilot, changing gears driven by age, with the promising of gliding in softly to land at retirement.”
However, he said the model did not take account of external factors such as the current market downturn.
Drew said that he and another Queensland academic, Dr Anup Basu had challenged the lifestyle investing approach based on more than 100 years’ of financial return data and found it to be potentially risky in terms of failing to meet the retirement saving goals of many investors.
“Selling when the market is low as it has been this year just because you’ve turned 45 doesn’t make sense,” he said.
AUTHOR
Mike Taylor
Recommended for you
Results are out for the latest sitting of the ASIC financial advice exam, with the pass rate falling for the second consecutive sitting.
Adviser losses for the end of June have come in 143 per cent higher than the same period last year, and bring the total June loss to over 350.
ASIC’s enforcement action is having an active start to the new financial year, banning a former Queensland financial adviser for 10 years in relation to fees for no service conduct.
ASIC has confirmed the industry funding levy for the 2024–25 financial year, and how much licensees can expect to pay.
