Industry still wary of ASIC
Many companies operating in the financial services arena have acknowledged being frustrated in dealing with the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), according to a research report commissioned by both ASIC and the Finance Industry Council of Australia (FICA).
What is more, some respondents suggested that ASIC “appeared to assume malicious wrongdoing where breaches occurred”.
The report, released by ASIC and FICA this week, said many were somewhat frustrated in dealing with the regulator because they believed it did not provide sufficient guidance in interpreting legislation, was too removed from the market and did not always understand the implications of its requests on business.
The ASIC/FICA report was nonetheless broadly positive about the influence of regulation on the Australian financial services industry and the actual cost of regulation.
However, it was clear from responses that many companies wanted ASIC to take a more relationship-based approach to dealing with individual organisations and with specific industry sectors.
To overcome some of the perceived problems with ASIC, the report said the main suggestions made by respondents were a reduction in the documentary requirements with respect to Product Disclosure Statements, the provision of better market guidance and closer consultation with industry.
It said that some respondents had asked that ASIC adopt an account-based management approach, which it was felt would help develop a more cooperative mode of working.
AUTHOR
Mike Taylor
Recommended for you
A panel of advisers have argued charging fees accordingly is a top priority for the industry, but Peloton Partners has found firms are reluctant to increase them until the business pressure is “unavoidable”.
Equal weighted ETFs are gaining ground with financial advisers, according to AUSIEX, as they believe they can bring balance to client portfolios.
Financial services software and technology provider Fin365 has appointed a new executive chairman to the board to support the firm’s strategic growth plans.
The FSCP has issued a written direction to an adviser who charged clients “extraordinary fees” for inappropriate and conflicted advice, as well as encouraged them to switch their superannuation into a poorly performing product.
