FWC expert panel transparency challenged
The Fair Work Commission's (FWC) expert panel has been challenged to give thorough reasoning for its default fund choices if the process goes ahead, with fears funds could be selected haphazardly given the looming deadline.
Indeed, the process as it currently stands could give priority to incumbent default funds and may not be scrupulous when it comes to analysing investment performance, according to Rafe Consulting director Barry Rafe.
Rafe conducted an analysis of the FWC's proposal to change the default fund structure under modern awards and found consumers would foot a bill of up to $400 million to transition to one of two to 15 default funds.
He told a panel discussion at the Financial Services Council's annual conference the process carries major risks, including anti-selection.
Addressing the same panel, Mallisons partner Nathan Hodge queried the expert panel's transparency requirements.
"Is the expert panel going to publish it's reasons?" He said.
Hodge expressed fears that funds that are not selected will be wiped out.
He noted that funds have the chance to reapply for selection four years later, but said most would likely not survive that long.
Recommended for you
With the final tally for FY25 now confirmed, how many advisers left during the financial year and how does it compare to the previous year?
HUB24 has appointed Matt Willis from Vanguard as an executive general manager of platform growth to strengthen the platform’s relationships with industry stakeholders.
Investment manager Drummond Capital Partners has announced a raft of adviser-focused updates, including a practice growth division, relaunched manager research capabilities, and a passive model portfolio suite.
When it comes to M&A activity, the share of financial buyers such as private equity firms in Australia fell from 67 per cent to 12 per cent in the last financial year.
