Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo
 
 

FPA urged Treasury to differentiate between large and small licensees

ASIC/australian-securities-and-investments-commission/financial-planning/Big-four-banks/banks/amp/IOOF/CBA/treasury/

12 June 2019
| By Mike |
image
image image
expand image

The Financial Planning Association earlier this year urged the Federal Treasury to redesign the proposed industry funding model and registry search fees for the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) to ensure the capture of large bank-owned licensees avoiding the need to levy smaller licensees.

In a submission filed with the Treasury in February and made public in recent weeks, the FPA pointed to the intended funding formula for ASIC’s close and continuous monitoring of large licensees noting that it involved two criteria – at least $1 billion in deposit products or at least 1,000 relevant providers.

In doing so, the FPA said it was concerned that the criteria was set too high and “could be avoided by those entities subject to this extra type of regulatory oversight”.

It then pointed to the wealth management businesses owned by the major banks, AMP and IOOF and the use of multiple licenses.

“As at June 2018, only one licensee met the criteria of 1,000 relevant providers,” it said. “This is partly due to the structure of the industry where it is very common for large institutions to hold multiple AFSLs all reporting to the parent company of the group.”

“Similarly, the alternate criteria of holding a total value of deposits of at least $100,000,000,000, may capture some parent companies but not all,” the submission said. “For example …. while the Commonwealth Bank may have a total of 1,557 advisers, this advice is provided under 5 separate licensees.”

It said that while the Commonwealth Bank might meet the criteria of holding a total value of deposits of at least $100,000,000,000, the licensees within the Commonwealth Bank group would not.

“There may also be some entities in the future, subject to this new additional ASIC activity that will not meet either criteria. This can be demonstrated by ASIC’s Wealth Management Project which focused on the standard of advice and remediation programs of the largest financial advice firms,” the submission said.

The FPA said it was suggesting that the criteria for the sub-sector for entities subject to “close and continuous monitoring by ASIC” be clear to ensure it captured those subject to such activity without inadvertently applying to entities who are not imposed with the extra regulatory oversight.

“Otherwise there is a risk that any shortfall in cost recovery will fall back on the entire industry, and that small licensees in particular will bear the unintended consequences,” it said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 week 6 days ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

2 weeks 6 days ago

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

6 months 3 weeks ago

After last month’s surprise hold, the Reserve Bank of Australia has announced its latest interest rate decision....

2 weeks 1 day ago

A professional year supervisor has been banned for five years after advice provided by his provisional relevant provider was deemed to be inappropriate, the first time th...

4 weeks ago

WT Financial’s Keith Cullen is eager for its Hubco initiative to see advice firms under its licence trade at multiples which are catching up to those UK and US financial ...

2 weeks 5 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
1
DomaCom DFS Mortgage
74.26 3 y p.a(%)
3